Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Sir Andrew Cathcart v. David Campbell — Replies, 18 Feb 1813

Abstract
AI-generated
Complainer claims Mr Campbell’s freehold from Lord Eglinton is confidential due to implied duties and gratitude, undermining formal independence assurances.

Sir Andrew Cathcart v. David Campbell — Answers, 5 Feb 1813

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by David Campbell, writer in Irvine, to the petition and complaint of Sir Andrew Cathcart of Carleton, Baronet, denying that his freehold qualification was conferred for political purposes.

Alexander Don v. Sir Andrew Cathcart and Richard Alexander Oswald — Answers, 18 Jan 1813

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Sir Andrew Cathcart, Bart. and Richard Alexander Oswald, Esq. Younger of Auchincruive, to the petition and complaint of Alexander Don, Esq. of Ochiltree, arguing that his claim to freeholder qualification is insuperable and contrary to law.

Petition — W. Gordon, Esq. against an Inner-House Interlocutor [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of William Gordon, Esq. asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Sir Andrew Cathcart of Carleton, Bart. v. William Gordon, Esq. of Milrig — Petition and Complaint, 2 Mar 1813

Abstract
AI-generated
Sir Andrew Cathcart petitions William Gordon over Chancery retours for Milrig, Greenholm, Sornhill, citing depositions from Ewart and Hunter.

Sir Andrew Cathcart of Carleton, Baronet v. William Gordon of Milrig, Esq. — Condescendence, 20 Feb 1813

Abstract
AI-generated
Sir Andrew Cathcart challenges William Gordon’s land claim by arguing Chancery’s rare post-1775 practice of recording old retours is irregular and unauthorized.

APPENDIX. INSTRUMENTUM SASINÆ, in favorem ALEXANDRI NISBIT de Greinholme in Quadraginta solidat. Terrarum de Greinholme, Mylnrig aliorumque, Super præceptum e Cancellaria Regia.

Abstract
AI-generated
Sasine instrument transferring forty solidi lands at Greinholme and Mylnrig to Alexander Nisbit, with reservations for his brother-in-law and a 11-year security term.

Petition — W. Gordon, Esq. against an Inner-House Interlocutor [3]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of William Gordon asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Sir Andrew Cathcart of Carleton, Bart. v. William Gordon, Esq. of Milrig — Duplies, 10 Feb 1813

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent defends claim to Milrig lands using an official Chancery extract, disputing complainer’s allegations of forgery and flawed historical practice.

Sir Andrew Cathcart of Carleton v. William Gordon of Milrig — Replies, 26 Jan 1813

Abstract
AI-generated
Replies for Sir Andrew Cathcart of Carleton, Baronet, to the answers for William Gordon, of Milrig, Esq., arguing that the respondent's evidence for enrolment is invalid and unchallengeable

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 179
  • Page 180
  • Page 181
  • Page 182
  • Current page 183
  • Page 184
  • Page 185
  • Page 186
  • Page 187
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in