Petition — Sir M. S. Stewart, to Postpone Advising Petition and Complaint against Him
Abstract
Petition of Sir Michael Shaw Stewart, asking the Court to postpone advising petition and complaint against him
Archibald Montgomerie v. James Dalrymple — Replies, 2 Mar 1813
Abstract
Replies by Archibald Montgomerie, Esq. of Stair, to the answers for James Dalrymple, Esq., arguing that the respondent's qualification was nominal and fictitious due to moral obligation and that the seisin taken on discontiguous lands lacks legal authority.
Archibald Montgomerie v. Sir Michael Shaw Stewart — 25 Feb 1813
Abstract
Petition by Archibald Montgomerie against Sir Michael Shaw Stewart over land valuation and cess records in Beith parish, citing historical sasines and cess rolls.
Archibald Montgomerie v. Sir M. S. Stewart — Petition, 24 Feb 1813
Abstract
Petition of Archibald Montgomerie, Esq. asking the Court to permit lodging of printed copies and excerpts to refute arguments in duplies, reserving inferences for advising
Archibald Montgomerie v. Sir Michael Shaw Stewart — Duplies, 17 Feb 1813
Abstract
Respondent defends his freehold qualification, disputing complainer's objections to Bogside and Boghall, asserting historical records, cess payments, and prior court rulings confirm his rights.
Alexander Don v. Sir Andrew Cathcart and Richard Alexander Oswald — Duplies, 20 Feb 1813
Abstract
Respondents challenge complainer's freeholder qualification after he sold estate and bound himself to denude it, arguing his title was not absolute and thus invalid under trust oath and 1681 statute.
Alexander Don v. Sir Andrew Cathcart and Richard Alexander Oswald — Replies, 9 Feb 1813
Abstract
Replies by Alexander Don, Esq; of Ochiltree, to the Answers for Sir Andrew Cathcart, Baronet, and Richard Alexander Oswald, Esq; younger of Auchincruive, arguing that his feudal right to vote was not impaired by a future sale of his estate.
Alexander Don, Esq. of Ochiltree v. Sir Andrew Cathcart, Bart. and Richard Alexander Oswald, Esq. Younger of Auchincruive — Answers, 18 Jan 1813
Abstract
Answers by Sir Andrew Cathcart, Bart. and Richard Alexander Oswald, Esq. Younger of Auchincruive, to the petition and complaint of Alexander Don, Esq. of Ochiltree, arguing that his claim to freeholder qualification is insuperable and contrary to law.
Petition and Complaint — & Comp.—Alex. Don, Esq; against Sir Andw. Cathcart
Abstract
Petition and Complaint of Alexander Don, Esq; against Sir Andrew Cathcart, Baronet, and Richard Alexander Oswald, Esq. of Auchincruive, asking the Court to alter the freeholders' refusal to enrol him as a qualified voter.
Sir Andrew Cathcart v. David Campbell — Answers, 27 Feb 1813
Abstract
Respondent upholds freehold grant’s validity and unconditionality, rejecting claims of nominality or electoral obligation.
