Baillie v. Dickson and Greig — Report, 19 Nov 1847 [2]
Abstract
Accountant's report quantifying debt owed by defenders to pursuer under caution bond, with liability apportioned based on succession and agreement terms.
STATEMENT of FACTS for Mr. Greig, and ANSWERS thereto.
Abstract
Mr. Greig defends against claims of liability for debts of deceased James Dickson, asserting he was only obligated under a conveyance of nursery business and not as assignee of father’s estate.
William Baillie v. Thomas Dickson — Condescendence
Abstract
Pursuer seeks relief and payment from defenders for unpaid bond obligations stemming from deceased co-obligant’s estate, involving executor-creditor duties and disputed intromissions.
Thomas Dickson v. William Baillie — Defences, 10 Jun 1845
Abstract
Defences by Thomas Dickson denying liability as heir, executor, or creditor of his father, James Dickson, in a summons for relief against him and James Greig, Jun.
William Baillie v. Thomas Dickson — Reclaiming Note, 27 Jan 1848
Abstract
Pursuer claims £653 12s 7d from executors of deceased co-obligant under 1826 bond; court decerns £168 7s 11¼ against Thomas Dickson and £56 2s 7d against James Greig, totaling £224 10s 7d with interest, but notes Greig’s liability limited to £50+£5 under 1837-39 obligations.
Statement 19. Answer 19. RESPONDENTS' STATEMENT of FACTS.
Abstract
Respondents deny a contract of sale was formed; they assert arbitration failed and seek jury determination of compensation under statutory provisions.
INTERLOCUTOR by Lord Robertson. STATEMENT of FACTS for the Complainers, and ANSWERS thereto for the Glasgow Water-Works Company.
Abstract
Complainers seek to avoid constructing protective works for respondents’ land by purchasing it under statutory option; respondents claim contract formed and seek jury valuation after arbitration expired.
The Glasgow, Airdrie, and Monklands Junction Railway Company v. The Company of Proprietors of the Glasgow Water-Works — Reclaiming Note, 12 Mar 1849 [2]
Abstract
Railway company seeks suspension and interdict against landowners to prevent jury determination of compensation for disputed land sale under Lands Clauses Act.
The Glasgow, Airdrie, and Monklands Junction Railway Company v. Company of Proprietors of the Glasgo... — Reclaiming Note, 12 Mar 1849
Abstract
Railway company seeks to reclaim an interlocutor refusing its suspension and interdict, asserting entitlement to expenses and statutory right to purchase land under Section 39 of its charter.
Thomas Smith Cuninghame v. Sir Robert Keith Dick Cunyngham — Case, 24 Jun 1847
Abstract
Advocator contests Lyon-depute’s grant of armorial bearings to a junior cadet branch, asserting a parliamentary statute confirms his superior rights.
