Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Charles Elder v. John Croall — State of the Process, 12 May 1848

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer claims defenders' stage-coach driver caused fatal accident by reckless driving; defenders deny fault, attributing death to accident and victim's frailty.

John Forrest Elder v. John Croall — Summons, 12 May 1848

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer claims £500 solatium and process costs from stage-coach proprietors for death of his father caused by reckless driving.

John Bethune Ross v. The East Lothian Central Railway Company — Bill of Suspension [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Bill of Suspension by John Bethune Ross, Esquire, Advocate, asking the Court to suspend proceedings and interdict the East Lothian Central Railway Company from issuing certificates for specified shares.

John Bethune Ross v. East Lothian Central Railway Company — Reclaiming Note, 23 May 1848

Abstract
AI-generated
Complainer seeks interdict against railway company; Lord Ordinary grants interim relief but later refuses note and orders expenses.

The East Lothian Central Railway Company v. Sir John Dick Lauder, Alexander Peffers, Adam Neill, Robert Miller and John Bethune Ross — Reclaiming Note, 15 Jul 1848 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders, original allottees of shares, reclaim against interlocutor declaring them rightful holders after scrip not registered; seek expenses and reversal.

Rec. Note—Alexander Peffers & Others against Lord Cuninghame's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Court rejects defenders' claims, upholds pursuers' right to register shares, and reserves claim against alleged purchaser Mr. Ross.

Shepherd Brown v. William Christie and James Thomson — 7 Mar 1849

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders challenge action of reduction by Shepherd Brown, asserting the church’s 1839 meeting authorized all deeds in question, including security bonds and conveyances, and that Brown lacked authority to sue.

Shepherd Brown v. William Christie and James Thomson — Reclaiming Note, 20 Mar 1849 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders, trustees of Daniel M'Intosh, challenge a reduction-improbation action by Shepherd Brown over disputed property in Lindsay Street, Dundee, claiming forged documents and improper conveyance.

RECLAIMING NOTE, M'INTOSH'S TRUSTEES, AGAINST LORD CUNINGHAME'S INTERLOCUTOR.

Abstract
AI-generated
Court rejects preliminary defences, reserves right to repeat on merits, orders enrolment, and awards expenses if defenders reclaim.

Appendix to Reclaiming Note, Robert Sangster and Others, (Trustees of the late Malcolm Stewart, Esq.) against Lord Wood's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Parties submit to arbiter Robert Stewart to divide common land boundaries and rights at Cluneskea, with survey and binding decree.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Current page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Page 38
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in