1793–1794
Decreet-ArbitralTackArbitrationInterlocutorReductionDebtJohn Finlay, defender, answered the petition of William Woddrop, pursuer, arguing that the interlocutor should not be altered and that the arbiters’ explanation was necessary to ascertain material justice. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Woddrop — Petition, 10 Dec 1793December 10, 1793 Petition of William Woodrop asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- William Woddrop v. John Finlay — Answers, 23 Jan 1794January 23, 1794 Answers by John Finlay to the petition of William Woddrop, arguing that the interlocutor should not be altered and that the arbiters' explanation is necessary to ascertain material justice.
People & places in this case
People involved
- Andrew Balfour Ramsay, of Whitehill — Party
- Walter Ferguson, of Kinnaird — Party
- Archibald Fletcher, of Parkhill — Advocate for Party
- John Lang — Advocate for Party
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Lord Ordinary
