Date23 Jan 1794TypeAnswersCaseWoddrop v. FinlayLength25 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 09MarginaliaYesAppendix1 item (2 pp.) Abstract AI-generated January 23, 1794 Answers by John Finlay to the petition of William Woddrop, arguing that the interlocutor should not be altered and that the arbiters' explanation is necessary to ascertain material justice. ← Woddrop — Petition, 10 Dec 17932 of 2 in this casePeople in this documentArchibald Fletcher, of ParkhillSubjectsLeaseContractTackInterlocutorArbitrationDecreet-ArbitralPlaces mentionedGlasgowEdinburgh