| Davies, Jones, & Co. v. William Young |
1786
|
Debt, Aliment, Oath, Interlocutor, Action, Bill of Exchange |
William Young petitioned the Court to alter an interlocutor pronounced by Lord Monboddo, claiming expenses, and Davies, Jones, & Co. answered the petition. The merchants defended against Young's claim for expenses and asserted that he had commissioned and received the six hats in dispute. |
| Eliott v. Lord Justice Clerk's Interlocutor |
1797
|
Trustees, Debt, Succession, Hypothec, Election contest, Action |
Sir William Eliott petitioned to reclaim an interlocutor of the Lord Justice Clerk denying his claim to £50:10s. paid to the writer Thomas Tod, arguing that the account was not prescribed and fell outside the scope of triennial prescription. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Inglis v. Bethune |
1798
|
Cautioner, Debt, Assignation, Interlocutor, Bankruptcy, Action |
William Inglis petitioned to reverse a court’s finding that defender William Bethune’s 1786 holograph bond was mere corroboration rather than new security, seeking to hold Bethune jointly liable for half the debt. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Maxwell v. Lord Swinton's Interlocutor |
1789
|
Arrestment, Action, Sequestration, Creditor, Mala Fides, Citation |
Charles Maxwell-Campbell petitioned the Court of Session to alter an interlocutor issued by Lord Swinton. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| McKenzie v. Buchanan and Company |
1792
|
Arrestment, Debt, Contract, Aliment, Employment, Action |
Daniel M'Kenzie, a spinner, pursued James and Archibald Buchanans and Company, his masters, contending that they had unlawfully deducted from his wages without contractual authority. The Buchanans subsequently petitioned the Court to overturn an inner-house interlocutor that had been pronounced against them. |
| Mitchell v. Lord Alva's Interlocutor |
1787
|
Contract, Debt, Damages, Action, Bargain, Interlocutor |
Pursuer Thomas Mitchell petitioned the Court of Session to alter its recent interlocutor in the dispute with Lord Alva. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Pringle v. Hamilton |
1793
|
Prescription, Bill of Exchange, Debt, Oath, Action, Assignation |
Pringle pursued Hamilton for payment of a bill of exchange drawn by David Cathcart in 1762, while Hamilton defended on the grounds that the instrument had not been duly negotiated and that the debt was prescribed. Pringle argued that Hamilton remained liable notwithstanding the alleged defect in negotiation and that the defense of prescription was inapplicable, but Cathcart answered that the debt had been discharged by payment made by his father. Hamilton subsequently petitioned the Court to alter its recent interlocutor. |
| Reid v. Lord Craig's Interlocutor |
1794
|
Advocation, Test, Debt, Action, Interlocutor, Sheriff |
James Reid, as pursuer, petitioned the Court of Session to alter an interlocutor pronounced by Lord Craig. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Scott v. Steuart |
1795
|
Interlocutor, Servitude, Property, Debt, Action, Arrestment |
William Scott petitioned the Court to overturn an interlocutor of the Lord Justice Clerk regarding David Steuart. Steuart answered the procurator-fiscal's argument that his necessary-house constituted a public nuisance. Scott subsequently petitioned the Court to alter its recent interlocutor against Steuart concerning the latter's obligation to clean a ditch adjoining a public road. |
| Stobie v. Morison, et al |
1788
|
Succession, Debt, Proof, Aliment, Collation, Action |
David Stobie, writer in Edinburgh, as pursuer, disputed Catharine Morison's claim to half the executry of her deceased brother Adam Morison. Morison and her husband, John Wilson, petitioned the Court to alter an interlocutor pronounced by Lord Stonefield in the cause. Stobie answered the petition, resisting her claim to the executry. |