1786
DebtAlimentOathInterlocutorActionBill of ExchangeWilliam Young petitioned the Court to alter an interlocutor pronounced by Lord Monboddo, claiming expenses, and Davies, Jones, & Co. answered the petition. The merchants defended against Young's claim for expenses and asserted that he had commissioned and received the six hats in dispute.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Davies, Jones, & Co. v. William Young — Petition, 24 Jan 1786January 24, 1786 Petition of William Young asking the Court to alter Lord Monboddo's interlocutor
- Davies, Jones and Company v. William Young — Answers, 1 Feb 1786February 1, 1786 Answers by Messrs Davies, Jones, and Company to the petition of William Young, defending against the claim for expenses and asserting the petitioner commissioned and received six hats in dispute
People & places in this case
People involved
- Alexander White — Party
- Robert Johnston — Party
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Advocate for Party
- Neil Fergusson, of Pitcullo — Advocate for Party
- James Burnett, Lord Monboddo — Lord Ordinary
- Robert Stark, Esq. — Named in case documents
