John Cowan v. Peter Campbell — Reclaiming Note, 11 Jan 1831
Abstract
John Cowan seeks review of Lord Fullerton’s interlocutor dismissing expenses claim in suspension case involving Agnes Watt and Peter Campbell.
General-Collection-of-Session-Papers-1831-12-FEB--23-FEB-221-224-257 doc0112
Abstract
David Black seeks suspension of a £160 bill due to alleged usury, improper notice, and overcharged legal fees, despite partial payments and security interests.
David Black v. John Bell — Reclaiming Note, 12 Feb 1831
Abstract
David Black seeks to reclaim a suspended bill against John Bell, requesting reconsideration of the Lord Ordinary’s refusal and urging referral to oath regarding retained interest and an alleged £30 payment.
General-Collection-of-Session-Papers-1831-12-FEB--23-FEB-221-224-257 doc0110
Abstract
Pursuer claims £1661 due from defender for unpaid services and balance from mother’s account; defender denies liability, asserts counterclaim and partnership dissolution.
William Beveridge v. Laurence Wilson — Defences, 2 Sep 1830
Abstract
Defences for Laurence Wilson, in the action of compt and reckoning raised against him by William Beveridge, asserting that the pursuer’s claim is groundless and the matter should be remitted to a prior judicial process.
William Beveridge v. Lawrence Wilson — Summons, 10 Jul 1830
Abstract
Pursuer claims partnership profits, capital share, and advances from defender, demanding accounting and payment of £6000 plus expenses.
Laurence Wilson v. William Beveridge — Defences, 2 Jun 1829
Abstract
unknown Defences for William Beveridge, Banker in Dunfermline, in the action of count and reckoning at the instance of Laurence Wilson, asserting that the pursuer is bound to account for the Company's affairs first and that the defender is owed a large sum.
Laurence Wilson v. William Beveridge — Summons, 21 Apr 1830
Abstract
Laurence Wilson sues William Beveridge for accounting and payment of £800 plus interest and £200 in costs, stemming from an un-settled 1815-1820 copartnership in mill-spinning at Midmill.
Laurence Wilson v. William Beveridge — Defences, 2 Jun 1830
Abstract
Defender denies debt to pursuer, claiming offset by £797 advances and asserting larger debt from spinning mill partnership.
Laurence Wilson v. William Beveridge — Summons, 17 May 1830
Abstract
Laurence Wilson, as executor of his deceased mother, sues William Beveridge for £1661:17:7 plus interest, arising from an unpaid account and services rendered during his employment.
