SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Complainers seek suspension and interdict to prevent road trustees from altering a turnpike road line through their lands without consent, citing statutory restrictions on deviation and purchase.

Abstract

AI-generated

Complainers seek to recall an interlocutor granting an interim interdict against a clerk, requesting the Court to pass their Bill and award expenses.

Abstract

AI-generated

Court refuses bill and recants interdict, finding complainers liable for expenses and deferring certificate until reclaiming note is advised.

Abstract

AI-generated

Respondents oppose sequestration, claiming petitioner is adequately maintained by a £400 annuity secured by land, exceeding the sought rents.

Abstract

AI-generated

Mrs. Margaret Paterson Waddel seeks judicial sequestration of Parkhead rents to protect her exclusive title, contested by her husband and daughter who allege revocation of prior deeds.

Abstract

AI-generated

Respondents oppose sequestration, citing the petitioner’s existing annuity and pending declarator proceedings affecting the property.

Abstract

AI-generated

Respondent trustee defends title to Gallochilly lands against suspenders' objection to unconfirmed mid-superiority titles, asserting confirmation validates prior deeds.

Abstract

AI-generated

Suspenders and charger dispute new titles to estate; Lords extend deadline for submissions.

Abstract

AI-generated

Charger seeks to reinstate a 1806 bond over Bridgeton property, alleging suspension due to creditor’s improper use of power of sale and failure to account for Port-Dundas transactions.

Abstract

AI-generated

Lord Jeffrey suspends charge, allows expense account, remits to auditor; charger seeks reversal, citing judicial admissions proving debt paid in 1807 via sale proceeds applied to other advances.

Subscribe to

BILL OF SUSPENSION AND INTERDICT. OUR LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION,—Unto your Lordships humbly mean and shew your servitors David Limond, Esquire of Dalblair, and Dame Grace Boswel

David Limond and Grace Boswell v. Alexander Murdoch — Reclaiming Note, 1 Jul 1837

REC. NOTE.—David Limond, Esq., AND Lady Grace Boswell, AGAINST Lord Cuninghame's Interlocutor. John Bowie, W.S., Agent for Complainers. Patrick and Crawford, W.S., Agents for Respo

James Waddel v. Mrs Margaret Patterson or Waddel — Duplies, 5 Oct 1837

Margaret Paterson or Waddel v. James Waddel — Replies, 7 Sep 1837 [2]

Mrs Margaret Paterson or Waddel v. James Waddel, &c. — Answers, 6 Jul 1837

Charles Ferrier v. Miss Mary Jane M'Donald Lockhart — Answers, 20 Jun 1837 [2]

Misses Lockhart v. Ferrier — Minute, 20 Jun 1837

Thomas Mackie v. William Watson — Reclaiming Note, 11 Mar 1837

William Watson v. Thomas Mackie — Reclaiming Note, 11 Mar 1837