Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

W. F. Home and D. Milne v. Pringle & Hunter's Representatives — 10 Jul 1835

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers William Foreman Home and David Milne sue representatives of deceased trustees John Pringle and James Hunter over trust management and entitlement to estates under entail and trust deeds.

William Forman Home v. Alexander Low, Trustee for William Molle — Answers, 29 May 1833 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender defends as trustee against claimant’s action for payment from sequestrated estate, asserting statutory immunity and proper claim lodgment.

RECLAIMING NOTE FOR WILLIAM F. HOME, Esq. of Paxton, and DAVID MILNE, Esq. Judicial-Factor on the Estate of Billie,—Pursuers ; In the Process of Count, Reckoning, and Payment, at t

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers seek court to alter reclaimed interlocutor and hold defenders liable for balance due by William Molle as factor under George Home’s trustees.

Reclaiming Note, W. F. Home, & David Milne, Esqs. against Lord Fullerton's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim defenders liable for unpaid factor’s balance from trust estate; Lord Ordinary finds Pringle negligent, exonerates Hunter.

STATEMENT of FACTS for Respondent, Mr John Grieve, AND ANSWERS thereto for Mr Clark, Advocator, and the Respondents, Mrs Thomson and Husband.

Abstract
AI-generated
Statement of Facts for Respondent Mr Grieve, and Answers by Advocator Mr Clark and Respondents Mrs Thomson and Husband.

William Clark v. Mrs Thomson and Husband, and John Grieve — Condescendence

Abstract
AI-generated
William Clark seeks return of title-deeds from John Grieve, asserting a valid hypothec over property that Grieve sold without preserving Clark’s secured interest.

William Clark v. Thomson and Husband, and John Grieve — 27 Apr 1837 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
William Clark sues Thomson and Husband, and John Grieve as trustee for James Scott and his creditors.

William Clark v. Christian Thomson or Morrison and Alexander Thomson and John Grieve — Respondents' Case, 6 Apr 1837

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents oppose trustee’s claims for feu-duties, expenses, and remuneration, insisting property proceeds must first cover duties and rejecting personal liability for unauthorized litigation costs.

William Clark v. John Grieve and Others — Revised Case, 6 Apr 1837

Abstract
AI-generated
Clark seeks hypothec over Duddingstone property to secure unpaid business account, while Morrison’s heirs claim title deeds as collateral for feu duties.

William Clark v. Thomson and Husband, and John Grieve — Complainers' Case, 6 Apr 1837

Abstract
AI-generated
Court orders revised case boxing; Lord Ordinary delays ruling on personal exception and hypothec apportionment due to legal complexity.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 417
  • Page 418
  • Page 419
  • Page 420
  • Current page 421
  • Page 422
  • Page 423
  • Page 424
  • Page 425
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in