Donald Cameron v. Alan Cameron — Memorial, 13 Sep 1810
Abstract
Alan Cameron, Esq, argues his family’s 1703 wadset lease, extended to 1780, was validly renewed under the 1752 Act and should not be reduced.
John Bower and Son v. Williams, Landale, and Company — Answers, 30 Nov 1810
Abstract
Respondents defend against claim for full debt by showing they paid only composition amount and goods value, not full debt.
Petition — Messrs John Bower & Son against Lord Newton's Interlocutors
Abstract
Petition of Messrs John Bower and Son, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
APPENDIX. No. I. DISPOSITION and DEED of ENTAIL of the Lands of Letterfinlay and others, by GEORGE CAMERON, Esquire, in Favour of Himself and the other Heirs of Tailzie within ment
Abstract
Dispositio and deed of entail for Letterfinlay lands, naming male heirs in order, with female heir-female primogeniture, jointure burden, surname/arms retention, and prohibition on alienation or alteration.
Gordon Cameron v. Ewen Cameron — Petition and Complaint, 8 Dec 1810
Abstract
Petition of Gordon Cameron asking the Court to remove Ewen Cameron as interdictor and appoint new interdictors for his father, George Macmartin, alias Cameron.
Hugh Macmorran and Company, and the Trustees for their Creditors v. Newcastle-upon-Tyne Fire-Office — State of the Process, 12 Jun 1809 [2]
Abstract
Trustees for insolvent claimants seek fire insurance payment at Garschew Mill; defenders allege fraud, false oath, and intentional arson to bar recovery.
Hugh Macmorran and Company, and the Trustees for their Creditors v. Newcastle-upon-Tyne Fire Office — State of the Process, 14 Nov 1809
Abstract
State of the Process by Hugh Macmorran and Company, and the Trustees for their Creditors, against the Newcastle-upon-Tyne Fire Office, detailing the state of the process in this action.
Hugh Macormack and Company, and their Trustee v. The Newcastle-upon-Tyne Fire-Office — Memorial, 12 May 1810
Abstract
Memorial of the Newcastle-upon-Tyne Fire-Office Defenders, arguing that the pursuers' claim for fire loss is void due to fraud and false swearing under the policy terms.
Hugh Macmorran and Company, and their Trustees v. The Newcastle-upon-Tyne Fire-Office — Memorial, 12 May 1810 [2]
Abstract
Defenders Newcastle-upon-Tyne Fire-Office opposes Pursuers Hugh Macmorran & Co. and their trustees in a Second Division memorial.
Hugh Macmorran and Company, Cotton and Wool-spinners at Garschew, and Charles Christie, Writer in Stirling, and William Paterson, Merchant there, Trustees for the Creditors of the said Hugh Macmorran and Company v. The Societ… — Memorial, 13 Nov 1810
Abstract
Creditors sue fire insurer over Garschew mill loss, defending against fraud, false valuation, and misdescription claims with affidavits and parish certificates verifying fair loss description.
