Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

James Bruce and Charles Selk-rig v. Peter Bruce, William Bruce, Mrs Anna Bruce, and Thomas Bruce Williamson — Memorial, 7 Jun 1798

Abstract
AI-generated
June 7, 1798 Memorial of James Bruce, Esq; and Charles Selk-Ric, Trustee, arguing that the entail of Tillicoultry does not bar the sale of the estate to satisfy debts

Elizabeth Burden alias Campbell v. Mark Campbell, Mrs Campbell, and Mrs Robertson — Information, 7 Jul 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
Mrs Elizabeth Burden, alias Campbell, claims as heir of her predeceased son John Campbell, she is entitled to his share of Duncan Campbell's residue under the will's substitution clause.

Tait v. Lord Stonefield's Interlocutor — Petition, 4 Jul 1798

Abstract
AI-generated
July 4, 1798 Petition of Walter Spens, asking the Court to alter Lord Stonefield's interlocutor, which found him subsidiarie liable for a debt after executors' estate was exhausted

Tait v. Lord Stonefield's Interlocutor — Petition, 13 Dec 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
John Tait, as factor for Spens’s executors, claims Gillons owe 82l. 8s. 9d. from Spens’s 1780 holograph account, rejecting defenders’ inflated 106l. 17s. 3d. claim.

Colonel Andrew Bruce v. Harry Davidson — Proof, 26 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
January 26, 1791 Proof by James Ferrier, writer to the signet, for Colonel Andrew Bruce, against Harry Davidson, that the proof may proceed as agreed by both parties and commissioners

David Wight v. Alexander Inglis, Elizabeth Inglis, Margaret Inglis, and Marion Inglis — Answers, 7 Feb 1799

Abstract
AI-generated
Feb 7, 1799: Inglis children answer David Wight’s petition, asserting 12,000 merks Scots legacy payable to their mothers’ issue under Andrew Simpson’s will.

David Wight v. William Inglis — Petition, 15 Dec 1798

Abstract
AI-generated
December 15, 1798 Petition of David Wight asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

David Wight v. William Inglis — Information, 12 May 1798 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
May 12, 1798 Information of David Wight, of Viewfield, arguing that the defenders ought to be assoilzied from the burdens of the 1774 settlement

David Wight v. William Inglis — Information, 12 May 1798

Abstract
AI-generated
May 12, 1798 Information of William Inglis, Alexander Inglis, Elizabeth Inglis, Margaret Inglis, Marion Inglis, and James Hay, arguing that the provisions in the 1774 settlements are not payable to them as heirs of provision

Stewart v. Inner-House Interlocutor — Petition, 14 Dec 1798

Abstract
AI-generated
December 14, 1798 Reclaiming Petition of William Stewart, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 294
  • Page 295
  • Page 296
  • Page 297
  • Current page 298
  • Page 299
  • Page 300
  • Page 301
  • Page 302
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in