Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Sir William Forbes and Others v. Andrew Gordon — Answers, 3 Mar 1789

Cunynghame and Gray v. Whitefoord

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Alexander Pitcairn v. Alexander Whyte and Archibald Bannatyne — Answers, 21 Apr 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
April 21, 1796 Answers by Alexander Whyte and Archibald Bannatyne to the petition of Alexander Pitcairn, arguing that the petitioner exceeded his authority in securing an extravagant insurance premium.

Charles Stewart v. Dougal McDougal — Answers, 20 Oct 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
Reverend Charles Stewart’s Oct. 20, 1791 reply to Rev. Dugald M’cdugal’s petition, defending retention of 38½ bolls of victual under a final interlocutor, asserting Glenfhira lands are annexed quoad sacra tantum to Inveraray.

Minister of Lochgoilhead v. The Ministers of Inveraray — Petition, 14 Jun 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
June 1791 petition by Duke of Argyll et al. seeking to revise Dec 1790 interlocutor allocating Lochgoilhead minister’s stipend from Glenshira lands annexed to Inveraray.

Pitcairn v. Whyte and Bannatyne — Petition, 21 Jan 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
January 21, 1796 Petition of Alexander Pitcairn asking the Court to overturn Lord Methven's interlocutor

Minister of Lochgoilhead v. The Ministers of Inveraray — Petition, 5 Jul 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
July 5, 1791 Petition of the Rev. Mr DUGALD M'DUGAL asking the Court to alter its interlocutor of December 8, 1790, which allocated 38½ bolls meal to the minister of Strachur

Sir William Forbes, George Skene, Robert Horn-Elphinstone and others v. Lieut.-Col. Andrew Gordon — Petitionand Complaint, 2 Feb 1789

Abstract
AI-generated
February 2, 1789 Petition of Sir William Forbes of Craigievar, Bart., George Skene of Skene, Esq., and others, asking the Court to overturn the Freeholders' decision to enroll Lieut.-Col. Andrew Gordon as a Freeholder by reason of nominal and confidential titles.

Pitcairn v. Whyte and Bannatyne

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

John Duke of Argyle v. Dugald M'Dugal — Answers, 11 Nov 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
Rev. DUGALD M'DUGAL’s 1791 reply argues Glenfhira teinds remain subject to his stipend, as 1650 Commissioners’ decree reserved them for Kilmorich’s minister, without parliamentary or High Commission ratification.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 269
  • Page 270
  • Page 271
  • Page 272
  • Current page 273
  • Page 274
  • Page 275
  • Page 276
  • Page 277
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in