John Paul v. Ronaldson & Others — Summons, 3 Jun 1831
Abstract
Defendants challenge arrestment and summons for non-payment of a £30 bill, asserting no funds were held or owed, and that trustees were not properly served.
John Gordon v. Mrs Janet Ramage Liston and Alexander Johnston — Duplies
Abstract
Petitioner claims ownership of property based on purchase, payment of debt, and delivery of deeds; respondents challenge via privilege and hypothec rights.
Mrs. J. R. Liston and A. Johnston, W.S. v. John Gordon and John Wilkie — Bill of Advocation, 23 Jun 1831
Abstract
Mrs. Liston and Mr. Johnston defend against John Gordon’s claim to recover a bond and sasine allegedly withheld after a property sale, disputing the validity of his purchase and the discharge’s enforceability.
Mrs. Janet Ramage Liston and Alexander Johnston v. John Gordon — Reclaiming Note
Abstract
Mrs. Janet Ramage Liston and Alexander Johnston seek to reclaim expenses in a conjoint process against John Gordon and John Wilkie, with Lord Fullerton’s interlocutor supporting their claim.
Recl. Note.—Mrs. Janet Ramage Liston, and Alex. Johnston, W.S. against Lord Fullerton's Interlocutor
Abstract
Advocates seek to retain bond and sasine from buyer after discharge of heritable debt; court finds they must return documents and remits case to sheriff.
RESPONDENTS' STATEMENT of FACTS, AND ANSWERS by the Pursuers thereto.
Abstract
Respondents deny liability for company debts after selling Sir John Inglis' share, asserting no obligation arose from the sale and that pursuers benefited from company surplus.
REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for Patrick Lindesay, and Others,—Pursuers; AND REVISED ANSWERS for Messrs John Tod, W.S. and John Romanes, Writer in Edinburgh, surviving Trustees of the de
Abstract
Pursuers claim partnership rights under 1770 co-partnership contract and 1798 supplement; defenders deny liability for unpaid bonds tied to deceased partner’s share.
Sir John Inglis's Trustees v. Patrick Lindsay & Others — Answers, 14 Jan 1831
Abstract
Answers by the Trustees of Sir John Inglis to the summons of declarator, relief and payment, asserting that the defenders were absolved of company debts upon transfer of Sir John's share to Mr Geddes in 1801.
Patrick Lindesay, and Others v. Sir John Inglis' Trustees, and Others — Summons, 13 Dec 1830
Abstract
Pursuers seek declaratory relief, payment, and damages from solvent partners' representatives for unpaid bond debts of the Glass-House Company.
William Baillie Kennedy Lawrie v. James Donald and George Charles Jones — Revised Case, 26 Apr 1832
Abstract
Pursuer claims rent and interest for Edgarton farm 1801–1819; defenders seek debt/land-tax deductions barred by prior rulings.
