Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

LC Volume 01 — Petition, 10 Sep 1812 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
September 10, 1812 Petition of Potts, Cooke, & Potts asking the Court to alter interlocutors of the Judge-Admiral and Lord Ordinary in a maritime insurance case against underwriters in Greenock.

Hugh Hamilton and others v. Mess. Potts, Cooke, and Potts — Answers, 12 May 1812

Abstract
AI-generated
May 12, 1812 Answers by Messrs. Potts, Cooke, and Potts, Merchants in London, and their Mandatory, to the bill of suspension for Hugh Hamilton and others, Underwriters in Greenock, responding to the claim that the vessel was unseaworthy.

Thomas Darling

Name
Thomas Darling
Occupation
Advocate
Connections
  • Read more about Thomas Darling
Life Dates
-

Hugh Hamilton and Others v. Potts, Cooke, and Potts, and Thomas Darling — Bill of Suspension, 15 Apr 1812

Abstract
AI-generated
April 1812: Underwriters in Greenock seek to suspend an Admiralty decree against London merchants and an Edinburgh writer, citing structural flaws in the ship La Gloire that rendered her unfit and unrepairable.

David Foyer v. Walter Galloway — Answers, 27 Jun 1810

Abstract
AI-generated
June 27, 1810 Answers by Walter Galloway of Coldervine, to the petition of David Foyer of Bogside, responding to the claim that sheep were improperly taken and delivered.

LC Volume 01 — Petition, 18 Dec 1810 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
December 18, 1810 Petition of David Foyer, Esq. asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

William Jackson v. Messrs Laurie and Pinkerton — Replies, 21 May 1810

Abstract
AI-generated
William Jackson’s 1810 reply denies concealing assets or fraud, asserting creditors overstated his worth and ruined his business by rejecting a 5s. in the pound composition.

William Jackson v. Messrs Laurie and Pinkerton, John Brown, Alexander Brown, and John Gray — Answers, 19 Apr 1810 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Creditors answer pursuer’s second condescendence in cessio, alleging fraud, failure to account for insolvency, and concealment of heritable property.

William Jackson v. Messrs Laurie and Pinkerton — Condescendence, 27 Feb 1810 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
February 27, 1810 Condescendence of William Jackson, present Prisoner in the Tolbooth of Glasgow, against Messrs Laurie and Pinkerton, alleging that a trust-deed concerning property held for his wife and children renders the objection to his cessio invalid

Peter M'Dougall v. Thomas Hunter — Answers, 12 Sep 1811 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
September 12, 1811 Answers by Thomas Hunter, Manufacturer in Glasgow, to the petition of Peter M'Dougall, Manufacturer there, responding to claims of newly emerged Company debts.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 171
  • Page 172
  • Page 173
  • Page 174
  • Current page 175
  • Page 176
  • Page 177
  • Page 178
  • Page 179
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in