Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

APPENDIX. CONDESCENDENCE FOR DANIEL TAYLOR, Writer in Edinburgh.

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender argues that spirit trade custom allows purchasers to measure casks without seller oversight and that empty casks are charged to common debtor, not specific dealers.

Petition — D. Taylor against Inner House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Daniel Taylor, as agent for his brother Philip, seeks to repel an interlocutor and submit his condescendence, arguing he’s bound only to a 10s. in the pound composition, not a fixed debt.

Robert Willis v. Daniel Taylor — Answers, 29 Nov 1810 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Daniel Taylor, Writer in Edinburgh, to the petition of Robert Willis, Merchant in Leith, responding to claims of overcharge and short measure in spirits transactions.

Robert Willis v. Daniel Taylor — Answers, 29 Nov 1810

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Daniel Taylor, Writer in Edinburgh, to the petition of Robert Willis, Merchant in Leith, responding to claims of overcharge and short measure in spirits transactions.

Petition — Robert Willis against an Inner-House Interlocutor [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Robert Willis, Leith merchant, seeks to overturn an Inner-House interlocutor rejecting his claim to represent a disputed debt.

APPENDIX. No. I. ACCOUNT-CURRENT between Philip Taylor, Edinburgh, and Robert Willis, Leith; Dr. made up by the Petitioner. Cr.

Abstract
AI-generated
Account-current between Edinburgh spirit-dealer Philip Taylor and Leith dealer Robert Willis, detailing transactions of rum, gin, brandy, and porter from 1802 to 1803 with permits and payments.

Robert Willis v. Daniel Taylor — Answers, 30 May 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Daniel Taylor, Writer in Edinburgh, to the petition of Robert Willis, Merchant in Leith, responding to claims of overcharge and misdelivery of spirits.

Petition — Robert Willis against Lord Newton's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Robert Willis asking the Court to alter Lord Newton's interlocutor

Daniel Taylor v. Robert Willis — Answers, 18 Jun 1805

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Robert Willis, Merchant in Leith, to the petition of Daniel Taylor, Writer in Edinburgh, responding to claims of deduction from account

Petition — D. Taylor, Writer, Methven's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner, a cautioner for 10s. in the pound on a debt owed to pursuer, seeks to avoid payment of a disputed balance until accounts are settled, challenging the pursuer’s account for overcharges and unreturned goods.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 165
  • Page 166
  • Page 167
  • Page 168
  • Current page 169
  • Page 170
  • Page 171
  • Page 172
  • Page 173
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in