Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

John Viscount of Arbuthnot v. Mrs Ann M'Kenzie — Answers, 6 Jul 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Mrs Ann M'Kenzie, Relict of the deceased Doctor John M'Kenzie of Stracathro, to the condescendence for the Right Honourable John Viscount of Arbuthnot, Pursuer, responding to allegations of facility, lesion, and circumvention.

John Viscount of Arbuthnot v. Mrs Ann Mackenzie — Condescendence, 21 Nov 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks to set aside leases held by defender, alleging fraud, undue influence, and gross lesion due to Viscount’s incapacity and defender’s exploitation.

The Right Honourable John Viscount of Arbuthnot v. Mrs Ann M'Kenzie, Relict of the deceased Doctor John M'Kenzie of Stracathro — Condescendence, 6 Jul 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender seeks to withdraw prior condescendence and petition to reframe proof; court orders new condescendence and answers to be submitted.

Petition — Petition Mrs Ann M'KENZIE against Lord Swinton's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Mrs Ann M'Kenzie, against Lord Swinton's interlocutor, asking the Court to alter the ruling and assoilzie her from the process

Petition — Mrs. Ann M'Kenzie, Lord Swinton's Interlocutor [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Mrs. M'Kenzie petitions the Lords of Council and Session to review an interlocutor granting the Viscount of Arbuthnott a proof to challenge her leases, citing procedural unfairness and financial hardship.

John, Viscount of Arbuthnot v. Colin Gillies — Answers, 12 Nov 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
Colin Gillies defends his leases against the Viscount’s heir, claiming fair market value and estate improvements justify rent reductions.

Colin Gillies v. John, Viscount of Arbuthnot — Answers, 12 Nov 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
Colin Gillies, merchant, answers a petition by Lord Arbuthnot regarding unspecified claims.

Petition — John Viscount Arbuthnot against an Inner-House Interlocutor [3]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of John Viscount of Arbuthnot, asking the Court to alter an Inner-House interlocutor against the defender Mr Colin Gillies, concerning leases of five farms on the Arbuthnot estate.

Petition — John Viscount Arbuthnot against an Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Viscount Arbuthnot petitions against an Inner-House interlocutor, challenging a prior judicial ruling.

Viscount of Arbuthnott v. Colin Gillies — State of the Process, 25 Jan 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
Defendant’s agent produces 68 letters from Lord Arbuthnott to prove contractual terms and financial arrangements, countering pursuer’s claim of lesion in farm lease.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 138
  • Page 139
  • Page 140
  • Page 141
  • Current page 142
  • Page 143
  • Page 144
  • Page 145
  • Page 146
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in