Date25 Sep 1784TypeAnswersCaseGeorge-Alexander Gordon v. Janet GordonAuthorRobert Blair, of Avontoun, Lord AvontounLength13 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 05MarginaliaYes Abstract AI-generated September 25, 1784 Answers by George Alexander Gordon to the argument that his father's 1730 disposition and tailzie were extinguished by prescription ← George-Alexander Gordon v. Janet Gordon — petition, 28 Jul 17843 of 3 in this casePeople in this documentWilliam Mackenzie, of BelmaduthieHenry Home, of Kames, Lord KamesAlexander Gordon, 4th Duke of GordonSir James Fergusson, of Kilkerran, Lord KilkerranAlexander Gordon, of WhiteleyAlexander Gordon, of PitlurgSubjectsTailzieSuccessionPrescriptionInfeftmentWadsetPositive PrescriptionReversionDispositionPlaces mentionedEdinburghPitlurgTunis