Date1766TypeRespondent's ProofCasePeter Ramsay and Others, Councillors and Burgesses of Pittenweem v. Andrew Martin and OthersLength136 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 01Appendix1 item (15 pp.) Abstract AI-generated June 26, 1766 Respondents' Case of Peter Ramsay and others, against Thomas Martin and others, Magistrates and Counsellors of Pittenweem, asserting their innocence in matters of bribery and election conduct. ← Peter Ramsay and Others, Councillors and Burgesses of Pittenweem v. Andrew Martin and Others — Answers, 18 Dec 17652 of 12 in this casePeter Ramsay and Others, Councillors and Burgesses of Pittenweem v. Andrew Martin and Others — Objections, 24 Jun 1766 →People in this documentWilliam Robertson, Lord RobertsonDavid Armstrong, of KirtletonGeorge Broun, of Coalston, Lord CoalstonRobert DickJames NairnDavid LowsonJohn DurkieRobert FallLord Robert Dundas, of ArnistonJohn MartinArchibald Cockburn, Esq., of CockpenAlexander TaitRobert MethvenThomas CleghornJohn FlockhartSubjectsDebtAlimentSuccessionElection contestOathCreditorAgentMala FidesPlaces mentionedEdinburghPittenweemAnstruther