Legal Subject: Innovation |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lord Halkerton v. Scott | 1769 | Interlocutor, Aliment, Presumption, Thirlage, Removing, Innovation | Lord Halkerton pursued James Scott of Brothertown regarding a causeway and cruive-dyke alleged to obstruct salmon passage. Scott condescended upon a proposal to sink part of his causeway to confine water within keying-stones, intending to remove objections to the construction. The superior heritors answered, arguing that the proposed alteration would not remedy the obstruction to salmon passage. |
Documents discussing this subject (5)
- Hammermen — Petition, 20 Jul 1776
- Incorporations of Hammermen, Tailors, Cordiners, and Maltmen in Glasgow v. Incorporations of Weavers — Replies, 6 Dec 1774
- Lord Halkerton and others v. James Scott of Brothertown — Answers, 16 Dec 1769
- Petition — Alexander Moffat against an Inner-House Interlocutor
- William Campbell v. Sir John Anstruther — Answers, 7 Dec 1790
