AI-generated

May 4, 1765 Answers by George Inglis of Reidball to the petition of James Earl of Lauderdale, responding to the argument that his right to the tithes is not established by prescription.

AI-generated

James Earl of Lauderdale petitions to alter court’s interlocutor, challenging defender’s prescription claim via prior inhibitions and judicial processes.

AI-generated

December 18, 1764 Information of George Inglis of Reidball, defender, arguing that his right to the teinds is not challenged by the Earl of Lauderdale, and that his prescription is unbroken by inhibitions.

AI-generated

Dec 18, 1764: Earl of Lauderdale claims title to Reidball teinds via inheritance and inhibition, rejecting defender’s claims from sale and prescription.

AI-generated

January 19, 1765 Information of Mrs. Helen Adam-Lauder, widow, arguing that as the wife of the suspender's son, she is entitled to aliment under natural law and precedent

AI-generated

June 12, 1765 Information of Alexander Young barber in Aberdeen, arguing that debts incurred by Jean Menzies in her capacity as trustee must be paid from the trust estate.

AI-generated

April 15, 1765 Information of John Menzies of Pitfodles, Esq; and George Turner, his Tutor-dative, arguing that the trust-disposition does not authorize the Trustees to contract debts for the infant's benefit

AI-generated

October 3, 1765 Answers by John Boyd and others, Executors-Creditors of Patrick Ewing, responding to the petition of Hugh Crawford and others, that the obligation letters are not probative of delivery or receipt.