Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Elizabeth Gilmour v. John Arbuthnot and the Viscount of Arbuthnot — Answers, 28 Nov 1765

Abstract
AI-generated
November 28, 1765 Answers by Elizabeth Gilmour, relict of Mr. James Justice, to the petition of the Honourable John Arbuthnot, arguing that the assignation to Mr. Arbuthnot was collateral security, not a trust.

Arbuthnott v. Gilmour — Petition, 14 Nov 1765

Abstract
AI-generated
November 14, 1765 Petition of John Arbuthnott asking the Court to overturn the interlocutor that ordered him to convey a debt and diligence to Mr. Justice's representatives

Arbuthnott v. Gilmour

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

Macdowal v. Borthwick — Petition, 17 Dec 1772

Abstract
AI-generated
December 17, 1772 Petition of John Borthwick asking the Court to remit the sheriff's interlocutor ordering his removal from the leasehold lands at Bankton Park and Blackgutter Park

Macdowal v. Borthwick

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

Elisabeth Countess of Sutherland and her Tutors v. James Sutherland of Pronsie — Answers, 9 Oct 1773

Abstract
AI-generated
October 9, 1773 Answers by Elisabeth Countess of Sutherland and her Tutors to the petition of James Sutherland of Pronsie, responding to the claim that the wadset lands are not redeemed.

James Sutherland v. Elizabeth Countess of Sutherland

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

Colin Campbell v. David Davidson — Answers, 25 Apr 1770

Abstract
AI-generated
April 25, 1770 Answers by David Davidson of Cantray to the petition of Colin Campbell, pretended Tackman of Easter Galcantray, and his Spouse, and Subtenants, responding to the claim that a clandestine tack is valid against a purchaser.

Campbell v. Davidson

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

John Pendrich v. Andrew and Marion Pendrichs — Replies

Abstract
AI-generated
John Pendrich, son of deceased John Pendrich, baker at Rosewell, and his tutor ad litem, reply to Andrew and Marion Pendrich’s answers, seeking admission of Haigs as witnesses ob penuriam testium to prove a clandestine marriage.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Current page 55
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • Page 58
  • Page 59
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in