Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Sir Alexander Grant of Dalvey v. Lewis Ray and others, Magistrates and Counsellors of Fortrose — 6 Aug 1767

Abstract
AI-generated
August 6, 1767 Interrogatories with Objections, Answers, and Replies by Sir Alexander Grant of Dalvey, Complainer, to the Magistrates and Counsellors of Fortrose, with Objections from the Respondents

Alexander Grant v. Lewis Ray and others — Petition, 21 Jul 1767

Abstract
AI-generated
July 21, 1767 Petition of Sir Alexander Grant of Dalvey, Baronet, asking the Court to alter its interlocutor which found Colonel Hector Munro not competent to be examined as a witness

Lewis Ray, and others, pretended Magistrates and Counsellors of the Burgh of Fortrose v. Sir Alexander Grant of Dalvey, Bart. — Answers, 17 Jul 1767

Abstract
AI-generated
July 17, 1767 Answers by Sir Alexander Grant of Dalvey, Bart. to the petition of Lewis Ray and others, pretending to be magistrates and counsellors of the burgh of Fortrose, elected at Michaelmas last.

Alexander Grant v. Lewis Ray and others — Petition, 10 Jul 1767

Abstract
AI-generated
July 10, 1767 Petition of Lewis Ray, John Bremner, George Greig, Colonel Hector Munro, David Ross of Inverchaffy, George Munro of Pointsfield, and others, asking the Court to overturn the interlocutor permitting Robert Logan to testify against them

Sir Alexander Grant of Dalvey v. Lewis Ray, John Bremner, William Smith, Alexander Falconer, Thomas Clark, George Greig, Colonel Hector Munro, George Mack — Answers, 9 Jul 1767

Abstract
AI-generated
July 9, 1767 Answers by the bailies and counsellors of Fortrose to the petition of Sir Alexander Grant of Dalvey, Baronet, against the election of magistrates and counsellors.

Alexander Grant v. Lewis Ray and others — Petition and Complaint, 30 Jun 1767

Abstract
AI-generated
Sir Alexander Grant petitions to remit an interlocutor allowing proof in his bribery complaint against Colonel Hector Monro and others in the Fortrose election.

Alexander Grant v. Lewis Ray and others

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

James Veitch v. James Cunningham — Answers, 19 May 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
May 1791: Merchants in Edinburgh answer petition by James Cunningham, asserting Covenant Close is their private property, not a common passage, citing historical deeds and a former gate.

Cunningham v. Veitch

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

James Watson and William Anderson and Company v. Thomas Lombe — Information, 24 Feb 1768

Abstract
AI-generated
February 24, 1768 Information of James Watson Merchant in Cullen, and William Anderson and Company, Merchants there, arguing that the defender's conduct in relanding tobacco and applying proceeds to his own use constitutes wrongful detention and malice

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • Page 48
  • Page 49
  • Current page 50
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in