George Grindlay and William Grindlay v. James Maccliesh — Answers, 15 Sep 1787
Abstract
James Maccliesh claims exclusive right to a narrow vennel adjacent to his property, disputing petitioners' historical claims based on surveys and lease boundaries.
John Watt v. William Wilson — Information, 13 Nov 1787 [2]
Abstract
Pursuers claim defender unlawfully raised and narrowed shared stair platform, encroaching on their ware-room and demanding restoration to original dimensions.
APPENDIX. No. I. Mr GRAY's REPORT.
Abstract
Expert report on structural defects between adjacent properties, followed by an agreement settling ownership and repair responsibilities for shared gables.
Petition — John Brander against an Interl. of Lord Henderland, dated 25th July 1787
Abstract
Petitioners challenge interlocutor imposing fine and imprisonment on William Innes for obstructing a town drain, asserting lawful authority and good faith in clearing it for public health.
Robert Scott v. Andrew Bruce, Alexander Oliphant, and William Dawson — Answers, 15 Sep 1787
Abstract
Robert Scott defends his prior poinding against petitioners who colluded via fraudulent bills to defeat his diligence.
Edward Bruce v. Walter Ross — Information, 10 Apr 1786
Abstract
Information of Edward Bruce, Writer to the Signet, arguing that a wager of L. 50 Sterling on the outcome of a parliamentary election was binding and enforceable in court.
Edward Bruce v. Walter Ross — Information, 16 Nov 1786
Abstract
Information of Walter Ross, Writer to the Signet, arguing that a wager on a parliamentary election outcome, contingent on a withdrawn petition, cannot legally support a debt claim.
Helen Douglas and James Baillie v. Elisabeth Chalmers — Information, 12 Nov 1787
Abstract
Information of Mrs Helen Baillie, Spouse of James Baillie, arguing that the Commissaries' decree against her must be suspended due to procedural irregularities and legal protections under marriage law.
Petition — of Messrs Tod and Forsyth, Trustees of John Shand
Abstract
Petitioners, trustees of bankrupt John Shand, challenge interlocutors granting Arthur Gordon & Co. preference for wine shipped post-bankruptcy, asserting statutory bar to first distribution due to late oath submission.
