Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

William Johnstone v. James and Robert Watson — Answers, 7 Sep 1820

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents claim petitioner is liable as principal guarantor for a £1000 note, not merely a cautioner, and that a later £699 note only liquidates the balance without discharging the original obligation.

James & Robert Watson v. Paterson, &c. — Summons, 27 Oct 1820

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim Robert Paterson and others owe £280 plus interest and costs from a dishonored bill drawn in 1819.

John Macnaught and Company v. Royal Bank of Scotland and William Mitchell — Answers, 31 Dec 1819

Abstract
AI-generated
John Macnaught & Co. defends against Royal Bank of Scotland’s petition to delay payment of a protested bank draft, asserting bona fides and challenging the Bank’s claim of fraud.

George Brodie v. Thomas Clark — Answers, 12 May 1801

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Colonel George Brodie to the petition of Thomas Clark, arguing that villagers at Fort Augustus must remain under Government control for the benefit of the garrison.

Elisabeth Millie and Husband v. David Millie — Answers, 4 Mar 1801

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Elisabeth Millie, only daughter and executrix of David Millie, to the petition of her brother David Millie, Esq, asserting that the prior decree of absolvitor was void for lack of merits being stated and was a decree in absence, not res judicata.

Robert Kyle v. Hugh Kerr — State of the Process, 12 Oct 1801

Abstract
AI-generated
Robert Kyle sues Hugh Kerr, farmer, for reduction of debt in Davieshill.

Appendix. Pursuer's Proof. Defender's Proof.

Abstract
AI-generated
Mrs. Ann Thomson, a party in the case, testifies as a witness for the pursuer after being assoilzied from the action, despite objections from defenders' counsel.

James Thomson and William Berry v. Mrs. Rachel Thomson and Mrs. Janet Geddes — Information, 16 Dec 1800

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders challenge reduction of uncle’s settlement favoring widow and niece, asserting testator’s sound mind and health at execution.

Reclaiming Petition — Hugh M'LACHLAN against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner contests an interlocutor granting Clapperton a preference claim over M'Culloch’s estate dividend, asserting it rests on invalid legal fiction and violates bankruptcy rules.

Magistrates and Town-Council of the Burgh of Linlithgow v. Neil, Earl of Roseberry and other Heritors; and James Dobie — Memorial, 19 Sep 1801

Abstract
AI-generated
Memorial of the Magistrates and Town-Council of the Burgh of Linlithgow, arguing that the minister has no legal claim for a manse and that the heritors have no right to relief against the Town.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 193
  • Page 194
  • Page 195
  • Page 196
  • Current page 197
  • Page 198
  • Page 199
  • Page 200
  • Page 201
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in