Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

APPENDIX. CERTIFICATE of the Valued Rent of Hallgreen, and parts of Inverbervie.

Abstract
AI-generated
Certificate certifies valued rents for Hallgreen and portions of Inverbervie lands, including fishings and tenements, with specified sums payable to county authorities.

William Adam v. William Innes — Answers, 25 Feb 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by William Innes, Esq. and M. Ure to the petition and complaint of William Adam, Esq., asserting that the respondent's inrolment is valid and objections are without foundation

William Adam v. William Innes — Petition and Complaint, 3 Feb 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition and Complaint of William Adam, Esq; of Blair Adam, against William Innes, Esq; of Cateaton Street, London, merchant, asserting that the Freeholders of Kincardine did wrong in enrolling him and asking the Court to strike his name from the roll of freeholders.

William Farquhar v. William Adam — Duplies, 30 Jun 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent defends enrollment via valid charter and seisin, rejecting complainer’s title defect claim based on extrinsic historical deeds.

William Adam v. William Farquhar — Replies, 23 Jun 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Replies by William Adam, Esq; of Blair-Adam, to the Answers for William Farquhar, Esq; of Balhamhill, in the county of Surry, and Masterton Ure, Writer to the Signet, his Attorney.

William Adam v. William Farquhar — Answers, 25 Feb 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent defends inrolment using a complete set of feudal titles including Crown charter, disposition, seisin, and valuation certificate.

Petition and Complaint — & Comp.—William Adam, Esq; against William Farquhar, Esq

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition and Complaint of William Adam, Esq; of Blair Adam, against William Farquhar, Esq; asking the Court to find the Freeholders of Kincardine did wrong in enrolling him as a freeholder.

William Adam v. George Harley Drummond — Answers, 19 May 1810

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by George Harley Drummond, Esq. of Drumtochty, responding to the petition of William Adam, Esq. of Blair-Adam, concerning the validity of a charter of confirmation and sasine in Drumtochty.

Reclaiming Petition — William Adam, Esq; against an Inner-House Interlocutor [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
William Adam seeks to overturn an Inner-House dismissal of his complaint against George Harley Drummond’s freeholder enrolment, contending the key charter confirming Drummond’s seisin is vitiated by a later date alteration.

William Adam v. George Harley Drummond — Memorial, 9 Feb 1810 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Memorial of William Adam, Esq; of Blair Adam, arguing that George Harley Drummond, Esq; of Drumtouchty's title to lands is ineffectual due to a vitiated charter confirmation.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 184
  • Page 185
  • Page 186
  • Page 187
  • Current page 188
  • Page 189
  • Page 190
  • Page 191
  • Page 192
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in