Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Allan Maclean v. Earl of Elgin — Answers, 28 May 1812

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by the Earl of Elgin and Others, Heritors of Dunfermline, to the petition of the Reverend Mr Allan Maclean, arguing that the designation of pasture ground is unjust and unreasonable, and that no decree for rent can be granted in this advocation.

Petition — First Minister of Dunfermline, to Apply a Judgment of the House of Lords [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks Court confirmation of Presbytery’s grant of manse and glebe land, contested by heritors on grounds of location and prior entitlement.

Petition — First Minister of Dunfermline, to Apply a Judgment of the House of Lords

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks Court confirmation of Presbytery's grant of manse and glebe land, contested by heritors on grounds of location and prior entitlement.

Petition — Jo. Sutherland for Leave to give in Replies

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of John Sutherland asking the Court to permit him to give in replies to the answers for Mr M'Lean, against such day as the Court shall think proper.

John Sutherland v. The Reverend Allan M'Lean — Answers, 17 Dec 1805

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent defends Presbytery’s manse site, countering petitioner’s property and convenience objections as unfounded.

Reclaiming Petition — John Sutherland against an Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Reclaiming Petition of John Sutherland, asking the Court to alter an inner-house interlocutor which adhered to a Presbytery decree designating a specific plot for a minister's manse.

XIII. CASE and OPINION by Shipmaſters and Carpenters, produced with Petition for John Watt to the Judge Admiral.

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks review of a prebytery judgment assigning a manse to a minister, challenging the decision as contrary to heritor rights.

APPENDIX. I. LETTER of Affreightment

Abstract
AI-generated
Freighter John Watt protests against master William Ayton for breach of contract, refusal to load cargo, and threats to crew and safety during voyage to St Petersburg.

Petition — John Watt against Lord Hermand's Interlocutor [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
John Watt seeks to overturn an interlocutor affirming a maritime insurance dispute over the seaworthiness of the brig Jenny and Peggy, citing defective repairs and master’s misconduct.

Alexander Campbell and Others v. James Hamilton, Senior and Company — Answers, 18 Jun 1813

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents answer petitioners' claim for marine insurance losses, disputing vessel's seaworthiness at departure from Greenock.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 168
  • Page 169
  • Page 170
  • Page 171
  • Current page 172
  • Page 173
  • Page 174
  • Page 175
  • Page 176
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in