AI-generated

Trustees of General Graeme's estate negotiate farm leases for Haugh and Keir Burn, address objections to submission clauses, consult Lord Methven on flood damage and repair costs, and respond to a petition from turnpike trustees seeking alteration of Keir Burn’s track.

AI-generated

Thomas Bruce seeks to void his purchase, alleging sellers concealed a major alteration to Keir burn’s course that materially affected estate value and risk.

AI-generated

Memorandum and report on proposed alteration of Keir burn’s course through Haugh farm, assessing risks of flooding, bank maintenance, land loss, and cost of new channel construction; includes engineer’s estimate and objections to restoring old channel.

AI-generated

Thomas Bruce seeks to suspend Braco estate sale over undisclosed dispute over Keir Burn’s altered course, materially affecting value and safety.

AI-generated

Respondent seeks payment of a bond from Appellant, heir to debtor Earl of Rothes, challenging the validity of an entail that allegedly shields the heir from ancestral debts.

AI-generated

Appellant challenges the validity of a pre-1685 entail of the Rothes estate, asserting it was legally binding under common law and the 1662 Court of Session decision, and that the 1685 Tailzie Act does not retroactively require registration of prior entails.

AI-generated

Pursuer claims 5000 merks and interest from Earl of Rothes under a 1716 bond; defender asserts estate is entailed and thus immune from creditors under 1684 entail and 1687 charter.

AI-generated

Information of John Earl of Rothes, Defender, arguing that an entail created in 1684 does not require judicial registration under the 1685 Act, and that he is not liable for his father's debts under the 1695 Act.

AI-generated

Mr Cunnynghame defends his liferent-right to Craigbait and Kersemeadow against objections that his title is nominal and he lacks possession, rebutting claims via historical retours and vassal possession.

AI-generated

Replies by William Mure of Caldwell to the Answers of Alexander Cunnynghame, one of the Clerks to the Signet, arguing that Mr Cunnynghame's title is nominal and fictitious and he is not in possession of the lands claimed.