Date13 May 1815TypeDefencesCaseLC Volume 04AuthorGeorge Cranstoun, of CorehouseLength4 pagesRepositoryLibrary of CongressContainerLC Volume 04Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated May 13, 1815: Defenders reply that pursuer’s bonds and notes are invalid due to lack of parental/consent and inconsistent signatures, and Thom’s indorsements are illegible and unsupported. ← Duncan Carmichael v. Mrs Fanny Cameron and Others — Answers, 5 May 181540 of 57 in this caseLC Volume 04 — Petition, 3 Jul 1815 →People in this documentGeorge Cranstoun, of CorehouseJames Scott, of ScallowaySubjectsDebtAlimentSuccessionExecutorPenaltyReductionDispositionInterestPlaces mentionedGlasgow