Interest (as a Qualification or Disqualification.) In order to entitle a party to institute an action in a court of law, he must have a title, and also a proper interest in the issue, for if he can derive no benefit from the result, the action will not be sustained; the presumption being, "that it is calculated to distress the defendant, and done in cemulationem vicini;" Karnes' Equity, 37. Such cases are necessarily of rare occurrence; but it is a question frequently tried, whether a person has sufficient interest to sist himself as a pursuer or defender, in a cause to which he has not been specially summoned.
Definition source
Bell, William, A Dictionary and Digest of the Law of Scotland, 7th ed. rev. George Ross (Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute, 1861), s.v. “Interest.” Public domain.
Legal Subject: Interest |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baines v. Turnbull | 1794 | Debt, Bill of Exchange, Creditor, Bankruptcy, Interest, Factor | Baines, the suspender, argued against Turnbull that he was not liable for bills dishonoured through no fault of his own. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Bannerman v. Shaw and Ritchie | 1795 | Debt, Aliment, Succession, Creditor, Interest, Interlocutor | The Reverend Mr. James Bannerman, as executor of Mrs Beatrix Goldie, petitioned the Court to overturn an interlocutor ordering him to condescend on a bond granted by his late husband. David Shaw of Jamaica and his attorney Alexander Ritchie answered, responding to claims under a bond dated 1771. Bannerman then petitioned to alter the interlocutor and be assoilzied, whereupon Shaw and Ritchie answered again, this time responding to the claim for a bond due from Bannerman’s late uncle Patrick Bannerman. |
| Cairns v. Common Agent in Ranking of Newlaw | 1791 | Debt, Interest, Bankruptcy, Sale, Cautioner, Agent | Thomas Cairns of Dundrenan, Esquire, petitioned the Court against the Common Agent in Ranking of Newlaw. He sought exoneration from the price of lots 1st and 7th of the estate of the deceased David Currie and delivery up of the bond. |
| Cowan v. M'Intosh and Others | 1795 | Adjudication, Interest, Disposition, Feu duties, Rent, Feu | Robert Cowan petitioned the Court to overturn an interlocutor that had dismissed his process against Mary and Katharine Gordon, the exposers of lands in Blythwoodholme. M'Intosh and others, as respondents, opposed the suspension by arguing that Cowan had breached the articles of roup by failing to grant bond for the purchase price and drawing rents without security. |
| Crosby and Attorney v. Maidment | 1798 | Debt, Aliment, Creditor, Assignment, Usury, Interest | |
| Eden, Ridley, and Company v. Threipland, et al | 1798 | Debt, Bankruptcy, Cautioner, Interest, Creditor, Interlocutor | Eden, Ridley, and Company, as chargers, sought enforcement of a bond to recover interest calculated on each individual advance, disputing the position of Dr Stewart Threipland of Fingask and George Oswald of Auchincruive, as suspenders, that liability extended only to principal and interest accruing from the date of bankruptcy. The suspenders maintained that the chargers' demand for additional interest ran contrary to prior interlocutors and established accounting practices. |
| Edinburgh Oil Gas Light Company v. Sir William Baillie of Polkemmet, Baronet, and Others, Trustees of the deceased Da… | 1835 | Debt, Statute, Contract, Partnership, Interest, Succession | The Edinburgh Oil Gas Light Company raised an action against Sir William Baillie of Polkemmet and others, as trustees of the deceased shareholder David Clyne, to enforce statutory calls for unpaid shares under the Edinburgh Oil Gas Company Act. The defenders denied liability, contending that the company had abandoned its oil-gas operations and improperly transferred its assets to a coal-gas concern, thereby invalidating the demands. The pursuers maintained their statutory right to recover expenses from the estate, while the defenders persisted in their challenges and ultimately reclaimed against the interlocutor, seeking to sustain their defences and be assoilzied from the action. |
| George and Wilsons v. Wilson | 1789 | Succession, Tack, Aliment, Lease, Trustee, Interest | George, David, and Mary Wilsons, children of the deceased George Wilson, answered the petition of James Wilson concerning Foulden-Newton, maintaining that the petitioner's claims were without foundation and that the case had been fully determined. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Gloag v. Thomson and Others | 1793 | Debt, Usury, Bill of Exchange, Interest, Aliment, Creditor | Gloag petitioned the Court of Session to alter the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor, which had assoilzied Thomson and the other defenders from an action for repayment of a £50 counter-bill. He subsequently petitioned again to alter the Court's subsequent interlocutor in the same cause. The representatives of James Thomson argued that the £50 bill was valid and that a prior bill for £107 10s had been paid. |
| Gordon v. Traill | 1832 | Debt, Creditor, Interest, Trust, Lease, Interlocutor | William Gordon and others, as pursuers, presented a reclaiming note against an interlocutor pronounced by Lord Mackenzie in their action against the defender Traill. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| James Donaldson and James Pinkerton v. The Manchester Insurance Company | 1831 | Insurance, Debt, Insurance Claim, Bill of Exchange, Interest, Assignment | James Donaldson and James Pinkerton raised an action against the Manchester Insurance Company to recover payment under a fire insurance policy for wheat destroyed in 1829, claiming £408 1s. 11d. plus interest and costs. The defenders denied the competence of the action and asserted that the claim was void and barred. The parties thereafter joined issue on whether the defenders were liable for the loss of wheat and whether the policy had been discharged. |
| John Court, S.S.C., Common Agent v. Mrs Tierney | 1832 | Debt, Creditor, Interest, Arrestment, Consignation, Interlocutor | John Court, S.S.C., Common Agent, pursued Mrs Tierney in a multiplepointing and exoneration proceeding concerning the estate of Lewis Cuthbert, Esq. The action arose from a process raised by Abram Wildey Robarts against Cuthbert's creditors and representatives, and subsequently the Earl of Galloway and J. A. S. M'Kenzie reclaimed against an interlocutor issued by Lord Fullerton, asking the Court to alter his decision. |
| Landale v. Carmichael, et al | 1792 | Debt, Adjudication, Interest, Teinds, Creditor, Security | David Landale, surgeon in Leven, sought to reduce decrees of adjudication and expiry of the legal granted against his uncle Thomas Landale, arguing that the claims contained pluris petitio and had been extinguished by intromissions made within the legal period. After Edward McCormick petitioned to alter an interlocutor, Landale renewed his challenge in 1794 on grounds of pluris petitio, informality, and extinguishment, prompting the defenders to file duplies confined to factual allegations. Landale subsequently maintained that adjudication being an articulate diligence, a pluris petitio in one article did not invalidate the entire decree. |
| M'Lehose and Others v. Parks | 1775 | Debt, Adjudication, Succession, Creditor, Disposition, Interest | James Shiels wanted to sell certain parcels of his estate in Partick, which had been encumbered by his and his father’s creditors. The creditors agreed to ratify these sales; in exchange, James agreed to dispone to the creditors the remainder of his estate. After this deal was executed, one creditor broke with the others and attached the property that James had disponed. Nonetheless, the non-adjudicating creditors proceeded to sell the property at auction. William M’Lehose, the purchaser, granted bond for the price, joined by his sons William and James (the eventual defender). However, in recognition of the ongoing adjudication, M’Lehose stipulated that he would retain the sale price, bearing interest, until the encumbrance was removed. The dispute continued for some time, and the creditors alleged that James M’Lehose was delaying its resolution. They sought an order from the Lord Ordinary requiring the accrued interest to be capitalized so that it would bear interest going forward. |
| M. M'Kenzie v. C. Mackintosh | 1828 | Expenses, Interest, Interlocutor, Arrestment, Debt, Creditor | M. M'Kenzie, as pursuer, raised an action against C. Mackintosh, as defender, regarding a fund in medio, and the Court upheld the oath references, granted a commission, dispensed with the minute-book, and awarded the fund to Campbell Mackintosh. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| MacDonald v. MacGillivray | 1793 | Succession, Liferent, Trustee, Creditor, Interest, Debt | Alexander Macdonald, trustee for the creditors of bankrupt Lieutenant Alexander Fraser, sued Farquhar Macgillivray to recover £400 due under a bond. Thomas, Alexander, and Ann Fraser, children of Lieutenant Fraser, argued that the fee of the lands of Aberchalader was vested in their mother rather than their father and thus not subject to the creditors' claim. Macgillivray maintained that the fee of the £400 was vested in Lieutenant Fraser rather than his wife or children. |
| Magistrates and Town-Council of Glasgow v. Anderston Brewing Company | 1785 | Interest, Debt, Libel, Interlocutor, Succession, Arrestment | The Magistrates and Town-Council of Glasgow pursued Murdoch, Warroch & Co., brewers at Anderston, for duties on ale and beer sold in the city, while the defenders claimed exemption on the ground that they operated outside the city boundaries and had previously agreed to pay only 10d per barrel rather than the 13d claimed. The magistrates petitioned to amend their libel to include interest on the duties, which the brewers opposed as improperly raised at so late a stage. Both parties subsequently lodged reclaiming petitions against the Court's interlocutors, the brewers maintaining their denial of liability for the full duty. |
| McHarg v. Dunn | 1771 | Debt, Estate, Bill of Exchange, Interest, Improbation, Sasine | Pursuer Agnes McHarg sought to collect from defender William Dunn on a bill payable to her late husband, Alexander McCredie. Dunn challenged the authenticity of the bill, relevant dates, and the rate of interest. McHarg maintained the bill was authentic and properly dated from 1748. McHarg also cast doubt on Dunn's testimony and allegations. |
| Muirhead, Hay, and Company v. Dunmore | 1792 | Debt, Creditor, Sequestration, Interest, Interlocutor, Prescription | Muirhead, Hay, and Company, merchants in Glasgow, pursued Robert Dunmore for payment of debts contracted in Virginia, contending that Dunmore was liable as a partner of Logan, Gilmour, and Company. Dunmore defended the action on the grounds that the debts were prescribed, lacked proper documentary support, and were improperly pursued following forfeiture in Virginia. |
| Purdie v. Lord Swinton's Interlocutor | 1788 | Debt, Aliment, Succession, Adjudication, Interest, Rents | Thomas Purdie petitioned the Court to alter Lord Swinton's recent interlocutor entered against him and to find that no expenses were due. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Quirk v. Buchanan | 1793 | Debt, Bill of Exchange, Creditor, Agent, Interest, Arrestment | Pursuer Matthew Quirk petitioned the Court to remit the interlocutor of Lord Dreghorn refusing a bill of suspension against defender Buchanan. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Riddell, Petitioner | 1798 | Sasine, Disposition, Interest, Debt, Trust, Insurance | William Riddell, along with Christopher Moubray and separately as trustee for Mrs Charlotte Wood, alias Gillespie, petitioned the Court for authority to distribute proceeds from judicial sales of landed estate. The first petition sought permission to pay a heritable bond secured by lands sold at judicial sale, and a later petition requested warrant for payment of the balance due from the sale of the Craigdarroch estate lands. The litigation thus comprised successive applications for judicial sanction to discharge encumbrances and trust obligations from the sale funds. |
| Scrimgeour and Son v. Alexander and Sons | 1772 | Adjudication, Affreightment, Interlocutor, Oath, Reduction, Interest | Documents available. Rich description in progress. |
| Thomas Thorburn v. Thomas Ranken | 1832 | Debt, Creditor, Trustee, Ranking and Sale, Disposition, Interest | |
| William and Henry Knox and Co Merchants in Dunbar v. William Law, Esq Sheriff-depute of Haddington, and Others | 1771 | Teind, Evidence, Fiar, Reduction, Court of Session, Interest | Pursuers William Knox and Henry Knox, merchants in Dunbar, supplied barley to brewers in Glasgow and Edinburgh. Knox and Knox alleged that defender William Law, the sheriff of the county of East Lothian, had set the fiar (fixed price) of barley too high. An Act of Sederunt in 1723 established the process by which a sheriff of a given county in Scotland would set friars. The Act required the sheriff to appoint a jury of at least eight landowners in the county, with knowledge of the good at issue, to set the price. According to the pursuers, the sheriff's responsibilities were purely ministerial, setting a price agreeable with the verdict of the jury. Knox and Knox alleged that Law did not comply with the 1723 Act when he set the fiar for barley. |
| William Gilmour and Others v. William Finnie and Benjamin Greig | 1832 | Expenses, Assignation, Credit, Interest, Suspension, Interlocutor | William Finnie and Benjamin Greig, defenders in the action raised by William Gilmour and others, presented a reclaiming note against an interlocutor pronounced by Lord Corehouse. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
Documents discussing this subject (showing 100 of 745)
- (SUPPLEMENTARY ACTION.)
- 1.—SUMMONS. 2.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for Pursuer; AND REVISED ANSWERS thereto for Defender.
- 180-1785-1800 doc0018
- 180-1785-1800 doc0033
- 180-1785-1800 doc0090
- 2.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for Pursuer; AND REVISED ANSWERS thereto for Defender.
- 2.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for the Pursuer, WITH 3.—REVISED DEFENCES for the Defender Inglis.
- 367.—MINUTE for David Milne, Esq. Judicial-Factor on the Estate of Billie; In the Action of Count and Reckoning at the instance of William Foreman Home, Esq. of Billie and Paxton,
- 690-1811-19-691-1821-28 doc0017
- Abram Wildey Robarts v. The Creditors and Representatives of Lewis Cuthbert — Case, 6 Sep 1832
- Adam Christie and Others v. The Royal Bank of Scotland — Summons of Reduction, 5 May 1835
- Additional Appendix for the Pursuer. CONTRACT of MARRIAGE between the Defender Mrs Bell Maclachlan and her husband.
- ADDITIONS upon revising the CONDESCENDENCE for Miss ELIZABETH SCOTT,—Charger ; AND ADDITIONS to ANSWERS for ROBERT YUILLE.
- Agnes Sommerville and her Husband v. Margaret M'Kechnie, &c. — Summons, 2 Feb 1815
- Agnes Watson, and James Taylor, her Husband v. Agnes Mathie, and James Weir, her Husband — Petition, 13 Jun 1776
- Air v. Johnston — Petition, 1 Dec 1786
- Aitchison v. Allan — Summons, 16 Jan 1830
- Alexander and Robert Brodie v. Joseph Brooks Yates — 12 Nov 1836
- Alexander and Robert Murray v. John Murray — Answers, 22 Nov 1832
- Alexander Brymer Belcher, John Bannatyne, and Harry George Gordon v. James Blyth — Petition, 13 Jun 1832
- Alexander Campbell v. John Campbell — Answers, 3 Dec 1772
- Alexander Dewar v. Robert Munnoch — Bill of Suspension, 12 Nov 1829
- Alexander Dick Junior v. William Richardson — Bill of Suspension, 1838
- Alexander Earl of Galloway v. James Earl of Morton — Case, 6 Jan 1759
- Alexander Farquharson v. Katharine Sinclair, Henrietta Sinclair, and Janet Sinclair — Answers, 11 Jul 1778
- Alexander Farquharson v. Katharine Sinclair, Henrietta Sinclair, and Janet Sinclair — Replies, 10 Oct 1778
- Alexander Gardner and David Downie v. Peter Mathie and others — State, 5 Dec 1793
- Alexander Gourlay v. David Straton — Note, 1 Mar 1826 [2]
- Alexander Grant v. Lewis Ray and others — Depositions, 1767
- Alexander Lord Macdonald v. Alexander Muir-Mackenzie — Information, 22 Apr 1780
- Alexander Mein v. James Hardie and Others — Revised Case [3]
- Alexander Morrice v. David Scott &c. — Defences, 25 Feb 1829
- Alexander Morrice v. George Burnet and Others — Summons, 13 Dec 1828
- Alexander Morrice v. George Burnet — State of the Process, 17 Jun 1830
- Alexander Smith v. James Grant and George Leslie — Reclaiming Petition, 17 Feb 1857
- Alexander Stewart, Esq. of Derculich v. Miss Jane Cathcart — Answers, 8 Sep 1814
- Alexander Stuart v. Earl of Minto — Answers, 10 Dec 1819
- Alexander Thomson v. John Miller — Reclaiming Note, 9 Mar 1827 [2]
- Alexander Thomson v. John Reid — 20 Feb 1809
- Alexander Wentworth Lord Macdonald v. Godfrey Macdonald Bosville — Decreet, 21 Jun 1815
- Alexander Wighton, Andrew Coats, and John M'Fie, Bailies of the Village and Barony of Gorbals; George Strang, Preses, George Young, late Preses, and Robert Shaw, James M'Lachlan, James... v. The Rev. Dr James M'Lean — Information, 27 Nov 1823
- Alexander Æneas Grant v. Mrs Wilhelmina Chalmers or Walker — Summons, 30 Dec 1835 [2]
- Allan MacLean v. Thomas, Earl of Elgin and John Sutherland of Fodbank — Memorial, 8 Oct 1812
- AMENDMENT of the LIBEL at the instance of ALEXANDER MACDONALD, AGAINST FARQUHAR MACGILLIVRAY. MARY PATERSON and others, AGAINST JAMES BALFOUR.
- AND REVISED ANSWERS FOR ALEXANDER MEIN, Accountant in Glasgow, now Trustee on the Sequestrated Estate of WYLLIE and ARCHIBALD, Merchants in Glasgow, and of GEORGE WYLLIE and THOMAS
- Andrew Dow and William Couper v. Archibald Young — Summons, 29 Jan 1836
- Andrew Miller v. Charles Stewart — memorial, 24 Sep 1799
- Andrew Ross and Others v. John Glasford and Company — Petition
- Ann Sutherland v. David Johnston — Appendix, 26 Feb 1811
- Anne, Lady Petre, and others v. Martha Grove, and others — Replies, 2 Mar 1787
- ANSWERS for ALEXANDER M'ALISTER, Esq. of Strathaird,—Defender; TO THE MINUTE of REFERENCE for John Nicolson, Junior,—Pursuer.
- ANSWERS to the CONDESCENDENCE and CLAIM for Mrs Jane Galt and Dr Black, her husband; and to the CLAIM for Mrs Captain Denniston and her Son. PLEA IN LAW. ANSWERS to the CLAIM for W
- ANSWERS to the Pursuer’s new Averments, contained in the different Articles of his Answers to the Defender’s Statement of Facts.
- Appeal, David Duff and Others, in Sequestration of the Estates of Archibald Menzies. Notes and Deliverance by the Sheriff-Substitute in the Competition for the office of Trustee on the Estate of Archibald Menzies, Aberfeldy. on Notes of Objections fo
- Appendix for John Cameron, to Reclaiming Note, Roderick and Thomas M'KENZIES against Lord Cockburn's Interlocutor
- APPENDIX TO MEMORIAL for Jean Duncan and her Husband.
- Appendix to Note of Appeal for David Duff, & Others, in Sequestration of Archibald Menzies
- Appendix to Pet.—Thomas Syme. Appendix, N° I. to Petition for Thomas Syme, Writer to the Signet, dated 10th March 1824
- APPENDIX TO PETITION for ALEXANDER STEWART, Esq; of Derculich. No. I. No. 1. BOND, by Major CATHCART, to JAMES WADDEL, and WILLIAM MELVILLE GIBSON of Madras, Merchants, dated 1ſt F
- APPENDIX TO PETITION for Messrs FINDLAY, DUFF, and COMPANY, Merchants in Glasgow, AGAINST LORD MACKENZIE'S INTERLOCUTOR. EXTRACT FROM ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT. ARTICLE FIFTH.
- APPENDIX TO RECLAIMING NOTE for John Falconer, Writer in Stonehaven; Thomas Barclay Armstrong of Clipston Street, London; and Misses Penuel, Eliza, Isabella, and Margaret Low, Daug
- APPENDIX, Containing the ACCOMPTS Referred to in the Preceeding Information.
- APPENDIX.
- APPENDIX.
- APPENDIX. 1.—PROPOSAL FOR ASSURANCE on Life of ANDREW KING. No. 6 of process.
- APPENDIX. ACCOUNT—John Lillie, Forres,—in Account with the British Linen Company, on Bond of Credit per £500.
- APPENDIX. BOND of CORROBORATION referred to on Page 5th of the preceding Petition.
- APPENDIX. Containing accounts, shewing the amount of the charge against Kilravock on the minute 1733, as at Candlemas 1758, in two different views. Account I. Shewing the amount of
- APPENDIX. CONTRACT OF MARRIAGE between Thomas Brown, Esq. Surgeon in Musselburgh, and Miss Jean Cochran.
- APPENDIX. CORRESPONDENCE between ALEXANDER PEARSON, Writer to the Signet, and ALEXANDER DOUGLAS, Writer to the Signet. 1.—LETTER ALEXANDER DOUGLAS, W. S. to Mr. ALEXANDER PEARSON,
- APPENDIX. CORRESPONDENCE between John Matheson, Esq. of Attadale, John Fraser, some time Agent for the Bank of Scotland at Inverness, James Pedie, Esq. Writer the Signet, and Other
- APPENDIX. DECLARATIONS of ALEXANDER MACRAE Charger, JOHN MAC-TAVISH Suspender, and of WILLIAM MACRAE, Son of the Charger.
- APPENDIX. Dr. Messrs John and James Wilson, in Account-Current with Pollock, Gilmour, and Co. Cr.
- APPENDIX. Extract Registered BOND or CAUTIONRY, by John Paul, Messenger in Ayr, and Cautioners; to the Lord Lyon.
- APPENDIX. HERITABLE BOND & DISPOSITION IN SECURITY, HENRY BELL and ARCHIBALD NEWBIGGING, TO JAMES YOUNG and WILLIAM STRUTHERS, for Behoof within mentioned, &c.
- APPENDIX. I.—CERTIFICATE of WILLIAM JAMES WHYTE, M.D., Banff. II.—CERTIFICATE of HENRY MILNE, M.D., Surgeon.
- APPENDIX. In Petition for Exoneration and Discharge. REPORT by the Accountant to the Court of Session, on the Intromissions and Management of James Dennistoun of Dennistoun, Curato
- APPENDIX. INTERLOCUTORS in Inferior Court.
- APPENDIX. Mr JAMES ANDERSON to Messrs Fox, Sons, & Co.
- APPENDIX. No. I.
- APPENDIX. No. I. ACCOUNT-CURRENT between Philip Taylor, Edinburgh, and Robert Willis, Leith; Dr. made up by the Petitioner. Cr.
- APPENDIX. No. I. AFFIDAVIT by John Baillie.
- APPENDIX. No. I. BOND and OBLIGATION by William Harley and Trustees, to Archibald Campbell of Blythswood.
- APPENDIX. No. I. BOND by James Stewart and Others, in favour of James Miller.
- APPENDIX. No. I. CONDESCENDENCE for Thomas Gillespie, only lawful Son and Heir of John Gillespie, late Tenant in Woodfoot, and Others, Executors of said John Gillespie,—in PROCESS
- APPENDIX. No. I. COPY—Letter from William Macdonald, Esq. W. S. TO Colonel Charles Campbell of Barbreck.
- APPENDIX. No. I. Excerpts from Heritable Bond by Mess. Alexanders to Mr Pulteney.
- APPENDIX. No. I. FIRST VIEW AS AT JANUARY 1823. I. Lord Montgomerie's Funds.
- APPENDIX. No. I. ORIGINAL LETTER—John White to Michael Macmillan. No. II. ACCOUNT between the Estate of MICHAEL MACMILLAN, Esq., and JOHN WHITE, W. S.
- APPENDIX. No. I. RENTAL, Crop 1794. RENTAL, Crops 1795 and 1796, the same as above.
- APPENDIX. No. I. SUMMONS OF MULTIPLEPOINDING AND EXONERATION.
- APPENDIX. No. I. SUMMONS.
- APPENDIX. No. I. The Heirs and Representatives of Captain Dugald Campbell of Auchnaba, IN ACCOUNT WITH ALLAN Macdougal, Writer to the Signet.
- APPENDIX. N° I. ACCOUNT and STATE of the price of these parts of the estate of Mackinnon, lying in the isle of Sky, and shire of Inverness, purchased by John M'Kenzie of Delvine, W
- APPENDIX. REVISED CONDESCENDENCE of Claim for John Shaw ALEXANDER, Esq. of Mackilston;. In the Process of Multiplepoinding at the Instance of AND REVISED ANSWERS for Mrs Barbara Al
- APPENDIX. STATE of the Balances due by the Purchasers of the Estates of Winton, Seaton, Long Niddry, Tranent, East Reston, PanmureHouse and Parks, Milltown of Gaval and Arnhall, at
- APPENDIX. SUMMONS, DAVID STRATON, Writer in Perth, against ALEXANDER GOURLAY, residing at Gilgal.
- APPENDIX. TACK, John Anderson to Alexander Mackerly.
- Arbuthnott — Petition, 27 Nov 1794
- Archibald Campbell Esq of Barcaldine v. Sir James Campbell of Auchinbreck Bar and others — 12 Jul 1785
