Date10 Jan 1793TypeInformationCaseBrown v. DundasAuthorAlexander WightLength26 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 08MarginaliaYesAppendix1 item (10 pp.) Abstract AI-generated January 10, 1793 Information of defenders, arguing that the statute under which they are prosecuted does not authorize the seizure of unstamped starch without prior notice or opportunity to comply People in this documentSir James Mackenzie, of Royston, Lord RoystonSubjectsAdjudicationStatuteFraudForfeiturePenaltyForgeryCommon LawExcisePlaces mentionedMonkton and PrestwickEdinburghPerthScotland