1793
Dundas, as defender, argued in an information that the statute under which Brown prosecuted them did not authorize the seizure of unstamped starch without prior notice or opportunity to comply. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.
Documents in this case (1)
- Alexander Brown v. Robert Dundas — Information, 10 Jan 1793January 10, 1793 Information of defenders, arguing that the statute under which they are prosecuted does not authorize the seizure of unstamped starch without prior notice or opportunity to comply
