Date11 May 1796TypeAnswersCaseProctor v. CarnegyLength31 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 12 Abstract AI-generated May 11, 1796 Answers by Sir David Carnegie to the petition of Patrick Proctor, arguing that the seisin granted to the petitioner is null because it fails to deduce the essential commission from Lord Strathmore. View larger map →← Proctor v. Carnegy — Petition, 5 Mar 17966 of 6 in this casePeople in this documentCharles Hay, of Newton, Lord Newton✳John Lyon, Earl of Strathmore✳Alexander Gordon, of Whiteley✳SubjectsFreeholder✳Sasine✳Title✳Infeftment✳Charter✳Seisin✳Disposition✳Conveyance✳Places mentionedForfar✳