AI-generated

Petitioners challenge an interlocutor ranking creditors’ claims on Kerse lands, arguing objections to Elizabeth Dickie, Janet Gray, and Elizabeth Weir were wrongly omitted and representation was valid under the Act of Sederunt.

AI-generated

December 17, 1793 Objections of the officers of state to the deductions claimed by Duncan Davidson, Esq; of Tulloch, Isaac Grant, W S. Agent, objecting to the inclusion of non-monetary casualities in rent deductions

AI-generated

May 30, 1794 Memorial of William Erskine, arguing that a missive-letter lacking statutory solemnities is null and void under the act 1681, notwithstanding acknowledgment of subscription.

AI-generated

April 24, 1794 Petition of Ro. Craigie asking the Court to alter its interlocutor and decern in terms of the libel, or to appoint the defender to answer facts and produce correspondence

AI-generated

February 25, 1794 Memorial of the petitioner, arguing that she and her predecessors acquired an heritable right to the teinds of Toftingall by positive prescription, despite lack of infeftment or charter.

AI-generated

March 7, 1795 Memorial of the defender, arguing that the Court's recent interlocutor mischaracterizes the Earl of Cromarty's conduct and misapplies the law of prescription.

AI-generated

March 3, 1795 Memorial of the pursuer, arguing that the prorogations granted to the Earl of Cromarty are inconsistent with the original tack and exceed the Court's legal power.

AI-generated

June 20, 1794 Information of the pursuer, arguing that decrees of prorogation of tithes obtained by fraud and in absence of Crown are void and liable to reduction