AI-generated

Respondent defends claim based on three bills and a bond owed by petitioner’s grandfather and father to Viscount Arbuthnott, disputing petitioner’s assertions of non-liability and prescription.

AI-generated

February 25, 1794 Petition of John Douglas Elq, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

AI-generated

Defender John Douglas denies Viscount Arbuthnot’s claim to prescribed bills, asserting all prior obligations were settled via bond and mutual understanding.

AI-generated

December 4, 1793 Information of the pursuer, arguing that the bills in question are not prescribed and are supported by a decree of constitution

AI-generated

Andrew Young seeks recovery from Francis Thompson and Alexander Trotter for breach of trust or fraud, citing witness testimony of his prior insanity and later rationality.

AI-generated

September 4, 1794 Information of the respondent, arguing that a lease of burgage subjects is binding against a singular successor under the act 1449, regardless of whether the purchaser was in knowledge of it.