SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

William Riddick seeks court to alter Lord Dreghorn’s interlocutor in reclaiming petition vs. Douglas, Heron & Co., arguing bond falls under septennial limitation and decree lacks valid diligence.

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Abstract

AI-generated

February 27, 1796 Answers by Thomas Milligain to the petition of William Gillespie and Company, arguing that he is a partner, not merely a servant, and that the petitioners' accusations are baseless and malicious.

Abstract

AI-generated

February 20, 1790 Petition of W. Gillespie and Co. &c. against Lord Stonefield's interlocutor, refusing a bill of advocation

Abstract

AI-generated

April 14, 1791 Information of Mrs Lydia Mariana Douglas, arguing that the condition in her father's will is void as capricious and unjust

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Abstract

AI-generated

October 11, 1792 Information of John Peter du Rouvray and others, arguing that adjudications lacking intimation are void and null

Abstract

AI-generated

May 15, 1792 Petition of John Ballenden against Inner-house Interlocutor

Subscribe to

Douglas, Heron, & Company v. William Riddick — Petition, 25 Nov 1791

Wilson and Company v. Carrier

Repository & Extent

William Gillespie and Company, and Taylor and Almond v. Thomas Milligain — Answers, 27 Feb 1796

Gillespie — Petition, 20 Feb 1790

Mrs Lydia Mariana Douglas v. Edward Ommaney, John Marr, John Page, and James Baillie of Culterallers — Information, 14 Apr 1791

Gillespie and Company v. Milligain

Repository & Extent

John Peter du Rouvray v. John Mackenzie — Information, 11 Oct 1792

Mackenzie v. Officers of State — Memorial, 2 Jan 1796

Mackenzie v. Officers of State — Objections, 17 Dec 1793

John Ballenden v. The Duke of Argyle — Petition, 15 May 1792