SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

December 11, 1792 Replies by the Trustees upon the High Roads in Ayrshire and thirteen justices of the peace, responding to the argument that the road by Crawfordland-bridge is of public convenience and should not be suppressed.

Abstract

AI-generated

September 6, 1792 Answers by the Trustees upon the High-Roads in Ayrshire and others to the petition of the Countess of Loudoun, asserting that the Court lacks jurisdiction to review their proceedings

Abstract

AI-generated

June 19, 1792 Petition of the Countess of Loudoun, Miss Scott, and others, asking the Court to overturn the trustees' decision to suppress the public road through Crawfordland-bridge.

Subscribe to

Countess of Loudon, and Others v. The Trustees on the High Roads in Ayrshire — Replies, 11 Dec 1792

Flora, Countess of Loudoun v. Trustees upon the High-Roads in Ayrshire — Answers, 6 Sep 1792

Loudoun — Petition, 19 Jun 1792

Water-Works Bond Creditors v. The York-Buildings Company and Creditors — Answers, 17 Jun 1803

Water-Works Bond Creditors v. The York-Buildings Company and Creditors — Petition, 25 Jan 1803

Water-Works Bond Creditors v. The York-Buildings Company and Creditors — Duplies, 8 Jun 1802

Water-Works Bond Creditors v. The York-Buildings Company and Creditors — Replies, 22 Jan 1802

Water-Works Bond Creditors v. The York-Buildings Company and Creditors — Answers, 15 Oct 1801

Water-Works Bond Creditors v. The York-Buildings Company and Creditors — Petition, 23 Jun 1801

Water-Works Bond Creditors v. The York-Buildings Company and Creditors — Information, 28 Feb 1801