Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Armstrong v. Armstrong and Warner — Report

Abstract
AI-generated
Warner, as surviving partner under a 1810 indenture, claimed 10% on £4300 capital; widow and trustees defended, arguing the partnership was colorable and pawnbroker rules barred secret partnerships.

Mathew Howden v. Daniel Munro — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Daniel Munro, Respondent, to the claim for Mathew Howden, Claimant, in the Submission to Andrew Rutherfurd, Esq., advoc...

Mathew Howden v. William Smith & Others — Revised Case, 23 Jan 1843 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender Mathew Howden defends against pursuers alleging violation of Pawnbrokers' Act through a partnership with Daniel Munro operating under Munro's name.

Richard Gordon v. Mathew Howden — Revised Case, 28 Jan 1843

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustee defends Mrs Munro’s right to manage sequestrated pawnbroking business, citing deceased partner’s settlement and duty to serve creditors.

Mathew Howden v. John Livingstone — 4 Apr 1837

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimant seeks dissolution of copartnery and exclusive possession of premises, respondent counters by asserting claimant breached capital contribution obligations and seeks repayment.

Munro's Trustees v. Howden — Answers, 16 Feb 1842

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender defends against claims of mismanagement and breach of partnership, asserting validity of contract and sheriff’s authority to wind up affairs.

John Marshall Mowbray v. Mr. Strachan and Mrs. Strachan's Executors — Minute, 15 Nov 1842

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees explain sale of Kelvinside estate to pay debts and legacies, with feuing plans abandoned due to higher offer.

James Strachan v. John Marshall Mowbray — Condescendence, 13 Oct 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimant seeks heritable property via wife’s jus mariti under father’s trust-deed; defenders admit facts but deny entitlement to heritable share.

II.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE and CLAIM for JAMES STRACHAN, Esq., AND REVISED ANSWERS thereto for JOHN MARSHALL MOWBRAY, Heir at Law ; and for GEORGE CRANSTOUN MOWBRAY and Others, Exe

Abstract
AI-generated
James Strachan claims trust funds for his deceased wife, Mary Catharine Mowbray, under their marriage contract and her father’s trust, against her heirs and trustees.

James Smith v. Archibald Galbraith — Revised Case, 2 Feb 1837

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders (church managers) seek to recall an interdict barring Reverend James Smith from preaching, arguing it violates possessory law by altering spiritual rights rather than preserving them.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Current page 55
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • Page 58
  • Page 59
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in