Inner-House. First Division
Abstract
Petitioners object to taxed printing costs for respondents' appendix in reclaiming note proceedings, requesting appointment of alternative town-clerk due to conflict of interest.
Respondents’ App. to Rec. Note, In Petition for Sequestration of the Estates of William Scott deceased, WEIR AND GARDINER, W.S., AGAINST LORD ROBERTSON’S INTERLOCUTOR. William Muir
Abstract
Respondents’ appendix to reclaiming note in sequestration petition against Lord Robertson’s interlocutor, detailing procedural history and costs incurred in 1841–1848.
APPENDIX. I. EXTRACT from LETTER—Messrs Weir and Gardiner to Wm. Scott, Junr., 27th November 1843. II. EXCERPT from LETTER—Mr Gardiner to Mr Gavin Scott, 12th November 1844.
Abstract
Agents demand payment for legal expenses in a dispute over estate intromission and prescribe debts, threatening sequestration if unpaid.
AMENDED CONDESCENDENCE for Gavin Scott, Farmer at Rigghead, by Bellshill, and for Robert Scott and Catherine Scott; and ANSWERS thereto for Messrs Weir and Gar-diner, W.S.
Abstract
Respondents oppose sequestration, disputing liability, representation, and adequacy of heritable security over Kirklands.
Unto the Honourable the Lord Ordinary officiating in the Bills, MINUTE for Messrs Weir and Gardiner, Writers to the Signet, Edinburgh, in the application at their instance for Sequ
Abstract
Petitioners seek sequestration of deceased William Scott’s estates; successors failed to appear, prompting publication notice and procedural delays for respondent’s amended objection.
Vol-432-175-201 unsorted seg080
Abstract
Petitioners seek to reclaim an interlocutor and recover expenses, while also applying for sequestration of deceased debtor’s estates under the Bankruptcy Act.
Reclaiming Note for Weir & Gardiner, W.S., in Petition for Sequestration of W
Abstract
Petition for sequestration dismissed; respondents awarded expenses and allowed to submit account for taxation.
Jackson & M'Cowan v. William Taylor — Appendix, 12 Jun 1848 [2]
Abstract
Respondent's appendix to reclaiming note in advocacy filed by Jackson & M'Cowan against William Taylor in the First Division, concerning a note dated June 16, 1848.
VIII. ANSWERS for the Pursuers TO THE Defender's Counter Statement.
Abstract
Pursuers deny allegations that order was reduced to 100 shares, a note of purchase was received, or the account rendered was valid.
Jackson & M'Cowan, Stockbrokers in Glasgow, and Thomas Jackson, Stockbroker in Glasgow v. William Taylor, Carpet Manufacturer, Kilmarnock — Answers
Abstract
Answers by William Taylor, Carpet Manufacturer, Kilmarnock, to the condescendence of Jackson & M'Cowan and their individual partners, denying the pursuers' claim to £255 for shares purchased on October 3rd.
