SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Richard Watson seeks suspension and interdict against Alexander M. Adams and John Miller to prevent enforcement of a poor rate assessment while challenging its legality.

Abstract

AI-generated

Mrs Lydia Eleanor Du Vernet Grosett Muirhead seeks aliment from her daughter Emily and her tutors.

Abstract

AI-generated

Petitioner seeks disentailment of Shirvan estate under 1848 statute, with consent of next heirs and release of bank funds.

Abstract

AI-generated

Appendix submitted by respondent in suspension in a civil case against the instance.

Abstract

AI-generated

Complainer seeks suspension of proceedings over disputed land title spelling discrepancy in disentailment instrument.

Abstract

AI-generated

Petitioner James Burness seeks remission of accounts against Dr. William Pollok Morris and Morris Pollok, Esq., alleging mismanagement and improper legal conduct by their counsel.

Abstract

AI-generated

Answers by Dr. William Pollok Morris and Morris Pollok to the petition of James Burness, responding that the petitioner grossly neglected instructions to object to evidence of insanity post-dating the codicil.

Abstract

AI-generated

Petition of James Burness, S.S.C., asking the Court to remit two business accounts to the auditor for taxation and decree

Abstract

AI-generated

unknown Revised Case for Suspenders and Chargers, with Statement of Facts, Answers, and Pleas in Law, asserting the minister's right to the manse under royal grant and Act 1641

Abstract

AI-generated

Complainers challenge a Presbytery decree requiring heritors to pay for manse repairs, citing legal and historical grounds to contest the burden.

Subscribe to

Richard Watson v. Alexander Maxwell Adams and John Miller — Note, 28 Jun 1849

Mrs Lydia Eleanor Bayly or Du Vernet Grosett Muirhead v. Emily Eliza Du Vernet Grosett Muirhead and Tutors — Summons, 18 Jun 1849

Petition — Petition, John Graham Campbell, Esq. for Dis-Entail [2]

Neill Malcolm v. John Graham Campbell — Appendix, 22 Jun 1849

Rec. Note—Neill Malcolm, Esq. against Lord Robertson's Interlocutor

James Burness v. William Pollok Morris and Morris Pollok — Appendix to Petition, 20 Jun 1849

James Burness v. Dr. William Pollok Morris and Morris Pollok — Answers, 16 Jun 1849 [2]

Petition — James Burness

Charles Hay Carnegie, Esquire of Pitforthie, and Others, Heritors of Brechin v. James Speid and Charles Will — Case, 19 Mar 1846

RECORD. NOTE OF SUSPENSION for CHARLES HAY CARNEGIE, Esq. of Pitforthie, and Others, Heritors of the Parish of Brechin, (named and designed as in the prefixed Reclaiming Note, and