Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Alexander Cunnynghame v. William Muir of Caldwall — Answers, 12 Feb 1760

Abstract
AI-generated
Alexander Cunnynghame defends his claim to Five Pound Land of Craigbeat and Kersemeadow against William Muir’s objection based on tax-roll and vassal land distinctions.

John Gordon of Achanachy, and Alexander Gordon of Whiteley his Trustee v. Mrs. Grizel Ogilvie — Observations, 21 Jan 1761

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers assert ownership of Balbegno estate via inheritance and trust adjudication, challenging Defender’s titles and claims of renunciation; Defender disputes facts, produces contested documents, and accuses Pursuers of misconduct.

John Gordon of Auchanachy v. Grizel Ogilvie — Answers, 5 Jan 1761

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent Grizel Ogilvie defends her father's legacy against Petitioners' claims of misconduct in a 1709 estate settlement by Robert Middleton, disputing allegations of fraud, undue influence, and improper inheritance.

John Gordon of Achanachy and Alexander Gordon of Whiteley v. Mrs. Grizel Ogilvies — Memorial, 17 Jul 1760

Abstract
AI-generated
Memorial of John Gordon of Achanachy, and Mr. Alexander Gordon of Whiteley, Advocate, his Trustee, Pursuers, arguing that they are not barred from challenging the Defenders' title to the Estate of Balbegno by representation of his father.

Grizel Ogilvy v. John Gordon of Auchanachy and Mr. Alexander Gordon — Memorial, 18 Jul 1760

Abstract
AI-generated
Memorial of Grizel Ogilvy, eldest Daughter and Heiress of the deceased Mr. John Ogilvy, arguing that the Pursuers are barred from challenging her title by virtue of her mother's binding obligation and her own forty-year prescription.

John Gordon of Auchanachy and Alexander Gordon of Whiteley, his Trustee v. Grizel, Katherine, and Ann Ogilvies — Answers, 11 Jan 1759

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by John Gordon of Auchanachy and Alexander Gordon of Whiteley, his Trustee, to the Observations for Grizel, Katherine, and Ann Ogilvies, Defenders, asserting that the Observations are improper and that the Defenders avoid producing evidence.

John Gordon of Auchanachy and Alexander Gordon of Whiteley v. Grizel, Katherine, and Anne Ogilvies — Observations, 1 Jan 1759

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders oppose the Pursuers' Memorial, disputing unverified claims about Mr. Ogilvy’s father and estate, citing lack of evidence and misrepresentations.

John Gordon of Auchanachy v. Grizel, &c. Ogilvies — Memorial, 23 Nov 1759

Abstract
AI-generated
Memorial of John Gordon of Auchanachy, arguing that he is not subject to his father's debts because the Wadset-sum was exhausted by his father's creditors and never touched by him.

Alexander Gordon of Whitley v. Grizel, Katharine, and Anne Ogilvies — Memorial, 27 Jul 1759

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders, daughters of John Ogilvie, assert ratification by his brother-in-law’s heir and prescription bar challenge to estate disposition by Alexander Gordon.

Mr. Alexander Gordon of Whiteley v. Grizel, Katharine, and Anne Ogilvies — Memorial, 13 Nov 1758

Abstract
AI-generated
Memorial of Grizel, Katharine, and Anne Ogilvies, arguing that the Pursuer's claim is barred by a ratified obligation binding his mother and father, and that his representation of them subjects him to that obligation.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Current page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in