Date19 May 1791TypeAnswersCaseCunningham v. VeitchAuthorRobert Hodgson CayLength9 pagesRepositoryWilliam & Mary School of Law, Wolf LibraryContainerW&M Wolf 3Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated May 1791: Merchants in Edinburgh answer petition by James Cunningham, asserting Covenant Close is their private property, not a common passage, citing historical deeds and a former gate. SubjectsAdjudicationPropertyPrescriptionPossessionSasineTeindsTackDispositionPlaces mentionedEdinburghKirkhillLeithCowgate