1791
The Merchants in Edinburgh, defenders, answered a petition by James Cunningham, pursuer, asserting that Covenant Close was their private property and not a common passage, citing historical deeds and a former gate. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (1)
- James Veitch v. James Cunningham — Answers, 19 May 1791May 1791: Merchants in Edinburgh answer petition by James Cunningham, asserting Covenant Close is their private property, not a common passage, citing historical deeds and a former gate.
People & places in this case
People involved
- James Cunningham — Pursuer
- James Veitch — Defender
- Walter Hunter — Defender
- John Dunsmuir — Defender
- Alexander Brown — Defender
- John Murray — Defender
- John Murray — Defender
- John Dick — Defender