Date5 Mar 1793TypePetitionCaseBell v. RutherfordAuthorGeorge Fergusson, of Hermand, Lord HermandLength20 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 09MarginaliaYesAppendix1 item (7 pp.) Abstract AI-generated James Bell petitions to overturn an interlocutor absolving the defender from repairing farmhouses, arguing the clause in his tack was false and repairs were never executed. 1 of 2 in this caseJames Bell v. John Rutherford — Answers, 25 Apr 1793 →People in this documentWilliam Riddell, W.S., of CamiestonJames Veitch, Lord ElliockJames BellJohn Lillie, at OxnamJames Scott, of ScallowaySubjectsDebtBankruptcyLeaseArrestmentSuccessionTackDiligenceArbitrationPlaces mentionedHunthillScraesburgh