Alexander and Jean Buchanan initiated a ranking and sale of land that had belonged to Robert Hall of Fulbar. The land was possessed by John Farquhar-Gray of Kilmardinny and Jean Hall, each of whom claimed to have a heritable security on the property. The Buchanans objected to these securities and raised a second process against Farquhar-Gray and Hall to challenge their claims. While the proceedings were pending, the Buchanans petitioned the court to sequestrate the land in question. Farquhar-Gray and Hall argued that it would be improper to sequestrate land that was already in their possession, and that the parties’ rights should be determined in the other proceedings.
People involved
- Alexander Buchanan — Petitioner
- Jean Buchanan — Petitioner
- Richard Allan, younger of Bardowie — Petitioner
- John Farquhar-Gray, of Kilmardinny — Respondent
- Jean Hall — Respondent
- Ar. Campbell — Advocate for Petitioner
- George Fergusson, of Hermand, Lord Hermand — Advocate for Respondent
- John Campbell, Lord Stonefield — Lord Ordinary
- Robert Bruce, of Kennet, Lord Kennet — Lord Ordinary
- Alexander Wallace — Named in case documents
- Robert Hall, of Fulbar — Named in case documents
- Robert Hall — Named in case documents
- Hugh Spreul-Crawford, of Cowdenhill — Named in case documents
- Margaret Semple — Named in case documents
- Jean Hall — Named in case documents
- Andrew Hall — Named in case documents
- Margaret Hall — Named in case documents
- William Paterson — Named in case documents
Places
- Renfrew (principal)
Alexander and Jean Buchanan initiated a ranking and sale of land that had belonged to Robert Hall of Fulbar. The land was possessed by John Farquhar-Gray of Kilmardinny and Jean Hall, each of whom claimed to have a heritable security on the property. The Buchanans objected to these securities and raised a second process against Farquhar-Gray and Hall to challenge their claims. While the proceedings were pending, the Buchanans petitioned the court to sequestrate the land in question. Farquhar-Gray and Hall argued that it would be improper to sequestrate land that was already in their possession, and that the parties’ rights should be determined in the other proceedings.
