1791
TrusteeCreditorAdjudicationDebtSaleSuccessionGeorge Haldane and other creditors pursued Charleton Palmer regarding the sale of the Grange estate and the ranking of claims to the proceeds. The creditors of W. Belchier argued that a summons of sale raised at the instance of an apparent heir does not operate as an adjudication for the behoof of the whole creditors, while Haldane sought to have his interest ranked pari passu with the other creditors.AI-generated
Documents in this case (3)
- Charleton Palmer and other Creditors of the deceased William Belchier of Grange v. George Haldane of Gleneagles — Information, 8 Sep 1791September 8, 1791 Information of the creditors of W. Belchier, Esq; arguing that a summons of sale at the instance of an apparent heir does not operate as an adjudication for behoof of the whole creditors
- George Haldane of Gleneagles v. The Creditors of the deceased William Belchier of Grange — Information, 8 Sep 1791 [2]September 8, 1791 Information of George Haldane of Gleneagles, Esq, arguing that his interest in the sale of Grange estate should be ranked pari passu with other creditors
- George Haldane of Gleneagles v. The Creditors of the deceased William Belchier of Grange — Information, 8 Sep 1791September 8, 1791 Information of George Haldane of Gleneagles, Esq, arguing that his interest in the sale of Grange estate should be ranked pari passu with other creditors
People & places in this case
People involved
- Mr. Haldane, of Gleneagles — Party
- William Belchier — Party
- James-William Belchier — Party
- George Haldane — Party
- Samuel Belchier — Party
- Sir James Fergusson, of Kilkerran, Lord Kilkerran — Lord Ordinary
- Robert Bruce, of Kennet, Lord Kennet — Lord Ordinary
Places
Where this case took place
Published Reports
William Morison, The Decisions of the Court of Session (1811), pg. 5299
