Sir Thomas Moncreiffe provided £1,000 to the younger children of his son, Thomas. A dispute between Thomas' two children, William and Patrick, was resolved in the latter's favor. William then became the target of several of Patrick's creditors, who brought action for payment before Lord Elliock. Sir William Moncreiffe responded with a process of multiple-poinding (claim adjudication), which Lord Kennet transferred to the process before Lord Elliock. Moncreiffe then petitioned the Court to affirm that the ranking must be fully adjusted before he be required to make payment. Cochrane, Murdoch, and Company, creditors in the ranking, answered that the ranking was indeed concluded. They also petitioned to be ranked on and to recover expenses from the draught of John Thain, another creditor of Moncreiffe, now deceased. John Thain's widow and children then submitted answers to this petition, asking the Court to refuse Cochrane, Murdoch, & Co.'s request. See also John Thain, Advocate in Aberdeen v. Sir William Moncrief of Moncrief, a related case that came before Lord Hailes.
Documents in this case (3)
- Creditors of Moncreiffe v. Moncreiffe — Petition, 6 Dec 1776
- Mess. Cochrane, Murdoch, and Company, merchants in Glasgow, and Peter Murdoch and James Brown, their assignees v. Sir William Moncreiffe of Moncreiffe, Baronet — Petition, 2 Jan 1777
- Mess. Cochrane, Murdoch, and Company v. Isabel Forbes, Isabel Thains, and Janet Thains — Answers, 5 Feb 1777
People involved
- James Veitch, Lord Elliock — Lord Ordinary
- Robert Bruce, of Kennet, Lord Kennet — Lord Ordinary
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Advocate for Pursuer
- Adam Rolland, of Gask — Advocate for Defender
- Charles Hay, of Newton, Lord Newton — Advocate for Petitioner
- Alexander Boswell, Lord Auchinleck — Named in case documents
- Cochrane, Murdoch & Co. — Pursuer
- Robert Stephenson — Pursuer
- Mr. James Smith, of Balharry — Pursuer
- Bethia Young — Pursuer
- Anne Young — Pursuer
- William Young — Named in case documents
- George Moncreiffe — Pursuer
- John Purves — Pursuer
- Sir William Moncreiffe, of Moncreiffe, 4th Baronet of Nova Scotia — Defender
- Isabel Forbes — Petitioner
- Isabel Thain — Petitioner
- Janet Thain — Petitioner
- Sir Thomas Moncreiffe, of Moncreiffe, 2nd Baronet of Nova Scotia — Named in case documents
- Sir Thomas Moncreiffe, of Moncreiffe, 3rd Baronet of Nova Scotia — Named in case documents
- David Stewart Moncrieff, of Moredun — Named in case documents
- Lieutenant Patrick Moncreiffe — Named in case documents
- William Mackoune — Named in case documents
- Robert Mackoune — Named in case documents
- Jane Mackoune — Named in case documents
- John Thain — Named in case documents
- Charles Banks — Named in case documents
- William Cuming & Son — Named in case documents
- Robert Scott Moncrieff, of Coats and Easter Rhynd — Named in case documents
- Richard Oswald, Esq., of Auchincruive — Named in case documents
- Peter Murdoch — Trustee/Tutor/Representative for Pursuer
- James Brown — Trustee/Tutor/Representative for Pursuer
Places
Sir Thomas Moncreiffe provided £1,000 to the younger children of his son, Thomas. A dispute between Thomas' two children, William and Patrick, was resolved in the latter's favor. William then became the target of several of Patrick's creditors, who brought action for payment before Lord Elliock. Sir William Moncreiffe responded with a process of multiple-poinding (claim adjudication), which Lord Kennet transferred to the process before Lord Elliock. Moncreiffe then petitioned the Court to affirm that the ranking must be fully adjusted before he be required to make payment. Cochrane, Murdoch, and Company, creditors in the ranking, answered that the ranking was indeed concluded. They also petitioned to be ranked on and to recover expenses from the draught of John Thain, another creditor of Moncreiffe, now deceased. John Thain's widow and children then submitted answers to this petition, asking the Court to refuse Cochrane, Murdoch, & Co.'s request. See also John Thain, Advocate in Aberdeen v. Sir William Moncrief of Moncrief, a related case that came before Lord Hailes.