This case was about the disputed ownership of a small piece of property on Jeffry's Close, Glasgow. In 1763, before pursuer Peter Clark purchased his property on the close, defender James Macgill petitioned the dean of guild for a warrant to enclose the disputed area. James Herbertson, Clark’s predecessor, failed to mount a challenge. However, by the time Macgill was ready to start work on the project, Clark had purchased Herbertson’s former property, which he understood to include the area proposed for enclosure. Clark complained to the dean of guild that the enclosure would be an encroachment. The dean-of-guild court ruled for Macgill, finding that the matter had been decided in the earlier proceeding, and Clark sought review. Case documents name numerous property owners and tenants in The Bridgegate (or Goosedubs) area of Glasgow.
People involved
- Peter Clark — Pursuer
- James Macgill — Defender
- Alexander Wight — Advocate for Pursuer
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Advocate for Defender
- James Veitch, Lord Elliock — Lord Ordinary
- James Herbertson — Named in case documents
- John Herbertson — Named in case documents
- David Gibson — Named in case documents
- Andrew Reid — Named in case documents
- William Russel — Named in case documents
- Peter Fleming — Named in case documents
- John Fergus — Named in case documents
- John Barton — Named in case documents
- Robert Cumming — Named in case documents
- John Gray — Named in case documents
- Cornelius Tod — Named in case documents
- Daniel Macewan — Named in case documents
- William Mackinlay — Named in case documents
- John Wright — Named in case documents
- Elizabeth Caldwall — Named in case documents
This case was about the disputed ownership of a small piece of property on Jeffry's Close, Glasgow. In 1763, before pursuer Peter Clark purchased his property on the close, defender James Macgill petitioned the dean of guild for a warrant to enclose the disputed area. James Herbertson, Clark’s predecessor, failed to mount a challenge. However, by the time Macgill was ready to start work on the project, Clark had purchased Herbertson’s former property, which he understood to include the area proposed for enclosure. Clark complained to the dean of guild that the enclosure would be an encroachment. The dean-of-guild court ruled for Macgill, finding that the matter had been decided in the earlier proceeding, and Clark sought review. Case documents name numerous property owners and tenants in The Bridgegate (or Goosedubs) area of Glasgow.