Will of personalty. It must be authenticated in like manner as a deed, q. v. Land cannot pass by testament, but only by words of present conveyance.
Definition source
Kinnear, J. B., Digest of House of Lords Cases Decided on Appeal from Scotland, 1709-1864 — Glossary of Scottish Law Terms (Edinburgh, 1865). Public domain.
Legal Subject: Testament |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binning v. Binning | 1766 | Succession, Testament, Aliment, Debt, Deed, Legacy | The Pursuer, Helen Binning, sought 500 merks (Scots) willed to her father as aliment by her grandfather in a 1733 deed of settlement. The Pursuer's father, Patrick Binning, died young, after marrying at age sixteen. The parties in this case disagreed over whether or not Patrick married with the consent of his father. Helen, the only child of the marriage, was raised in her grandfather's home after the death of her father. The Defender, James Binning, was Helen Binning's uncle, eldest son of James Binning the elder. The Defender claimed that since his brother, Patrick Binning, died before reaching majority and before his father's death, Helen Binning's claim to her father's aliment payment was invalid. Upon the death of Margaret Binning, Helen's grandmother, in 1762, Helen brought action before the sheriff of Linlithgow against her uncle for payment of the 500 merks. |
| Coventry v. Lord Hailes' Interlocutor | 1787 | Succession, Legacy, Liferent, Aliment, Testament, Debt | Robert Coventry presented a petition challenging an interlocutor pronounced by Lord Hailes. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Yorkston, et al. v. Grieve | 1794 | Deed, Witness, Testament, Succession, Assignation, Executor | Yorkston and his co-petitioners pursued Grieve concerning the validity of a testamentary deed executed by the illiterate Jean Ferguson. They argued that the instrument was valid despite the notary’s docquet failing to record that it was read over to the testatrix, whereas Grieve maintained that because Ferguson could neither read nor write, the deed required to be read to her before she authorized the notary’s signature, and was void for want of that formality. |
Documents discussing this subject (35)
- Alexander Morison and John Blaikie v. Francis Alexander, Earl of Kintore and his Curators — Summons, 8 Jan 1846
- Alexander Wemyss and William Wemyss of Craighall v. Isabel Gordon — Information, 20 Nov 1764
- Andrew Stevenson v. Sarah Gardner, or Johnston, or Macmillan — Reclaiming Note, 18 Dec 1829
- APPENDIX. INSTRUMENTUM SASINÆ, in favorem ALEXANDRI NISBIT de Greinholme in Quadraginta solidat. Terrarum de Greinholme, Mylnrig aliorumque, Super præceptum e Cancellaria Regia.
- APPENDIX. No. I. COPY of the WILL of GEORGE AITKIN, Esq. of St Croix,
- Coventry v. Lord Hailes' Interlocutor — Petition, 27 Nov 1787
- Davidson — Petition, 25 May 1797
- Duncan Stewart v. Mary, Jean, Patrick, Elizabeth, Alexander, Stewart, and William Watsons, George Wilkie, Duncan, Margaret, Mary, and Anne Stewarts, Duncan Stewart, Donald M'Queen, Donald M'Donald and Lieutenant John Alexander… — replies, 6 Apr 1797
- Edinburgh, Executrix of the deceased CATHARINE JOHNSTONE, her Sister, with consent of her Factrix and Curators, IN PROCESS AT THEIR INSTANCE AGAINST JOHN MUIR LOWDEN and WILLIAM WI
- Elfinstone-Collection-Vol-32 seg08
- Francis Cunynghame v. Sir John Whitefoord — Information, 10 Feb 1797
- George Norvell of Boghall v. John Ramsay of Kinnaltry — Petition, 27 Jan 1764
- George Norvell of Boghall v. John Ramsay of Kinnalty — Answers, 9 Feb 1764
- Helen and Janet Shaws, William Young and John Strang v. John Shaw — Answers, 17 Sep 1807
- James Gordon and Margaret Williamson v. Lieutenant James Fife and Archibald Young — Information, 5 Sep 1793
- Janet Dougal v. John Dougal — 28 Feb 1788
- John Gavin & Others v. The Sea Insurance Company of Scotland — Petition, 28 May 1822
- Mary Grieve v. James Yorkston, Barbara Douglas, and Elspeth Libertone — Answers, 25 Jun 1794
- Mrs Lydia Mariana Douglas v. Edward Ommaney, John Marr, John Page and James Baillie — Information, 19 Feb 1793
- Mrs Rebecca Hog v. Thomas Hog — Answers, 26 Feb 1791
- Mrs Rebecca Hog v. Thomas Hog — Answers, 26 Feb 1791 [2]
- Mrs Sarah Gardner or Johnstone or Macmillan and Basil Macmillan v. Andrew Stevenson — Reclaiming Note, 5 Jan 1830
- Oliphant — Additional Petition, 6 Dec 1792
- Petition — Feb. 10, 1815. Petition. Mrs Crighton and Husband against Lord Reston's Interlocutor
- Petition — Lady Margaret Primerose Countess of Caithness, and Lady Dorothea Primerose, Daughters of the deceas'd Archibald Earl of Roseberie, with Concourse of Alexander Earl of Caithness for his Interest [2]
- Petition — Robert Aird of Crossflat
- Rebecca Hog and Thomas Lashley v. Thomas Hog — Memorial, 16 Feb 1791
- Reclaiming Petition — Janet Tarbet against an Interl. of Lord Eskgrove, Nov. 14. 1786
- Robert and Gordon Howdens v. Mrs Isabella Howden — Memorial, 8 Sep 1814 [2]
- Robert Sclater, Die-Cutter in Edinburgh, and Others v. David Clyne, S.S.C. — Reclaiming Note, 11 Jan 1831
- Robert White v. Janet Tarbet — Answers, 4 Jan 1787
- Shaw v. Shaw — Proof
- Unto the Right Honourable the Lords of Council and Session, Reclaiming Note Mrs Janet Liddell Steele or Stodart, Spouse of James Stodart, Farmer, Walston, and the said James Stodar
- William, Marion and Helen Gordons and John Caicheon v. Elizabeth Wallace — Answers, 18 Apr 1766
- Yorkston — Petition, 29 Jan 1794